- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- politics@lemmy.world
He’s not just protecting pedos, he is a pedo. He is part of a whole ring of disgusting perverts.
not only pedophile, but a RAPIST.
He didn’t really flip out, as much as he was just trying to ignore him, and when he couldn’t anymore he tucked his micro-dick inside and whimpered that the guy “is a communist”.
The more egregious part is the fact his dumbfuck base cheered the guy’s removal and Trump calling him a communist. They know Trump rapes kids. They love it.
Not recognizing boundaries and not understanding consent are what made the USA possible.
“Flips out” This hyperbolic shit really grinds my gears. The protester didn’t shut up until everyone got annoyed, the Trump made a “joke” and went on a brief tangent full of lies, as normal. This isn’t a flip out. In fact this is barely worth reporting.
Didn’t you see him get SLAMMED and DESTROYED!
/s
Fully agree with you though. This wording is getting very irritating.
Click/engagement-bait.
I’m wondering if all media in a capitalist society gradually just become providers of content?
Last month, a protester repeatedly shouted “pedophile” at Trump and gave him two middle fingers while he toured a Mack truck factory in Macungie, Pennsylvania.
Buy this guy a beer!
Apparently, as far as Trump is concerned, only communists would think that protecting pedophiles is a bad thing.
If I had to choose between pedo’s and commie rat bastards… Well. I can live with the rat bastards.
though socialism is preffered over both.
What are commie rat bastards and why are socialists preferred, while communists are dehumanized?
Communists kind of have a track record of putting fascist dictators in charge, kinda undermines the whole ideology.
Oh rly? Which communists put fascist dictators in charge? Please, enlighten me.
Is there an example of a functioning properly communist state?
Okay, so, I see that as an admission that you were just spewing bullshit and now can’t defend it.
Is there an example of a functioning properly communist state?
If anything, then it’s socialist states, as Communism is per definition a state-less society, which can’t develop as long as Capitalism is still a thing. Socialism is the phase between Capitalism and Communism, when the working class has seized power and starts to socialize every aspect of production, infrastructure and housing.
I’m not going to put down a lengthy answer, but I found a good one on reddit. There you can read about actual existing socialist states, if you’re actually interested.
And luckily for these “chosen” benevolent leaders who just happen to reside in palaces, these socialist states have no end in sight. In one of your linked examples, dprk has been trying to reach communism for over 70 years now. And their chosen leader happened to choose his son to benevolently lead their people. And that son happened to choose his son to continue his work to bring upon communism. Almost like a monarchy, but not quite because they’re socialist and they have “democratic” in name so they’re actually good and totally different.
Ah yes, the far left has this special secret strategy where they actually put far right dictators in charge.
When has the far left put anyone in power that wasn’t a fascist dictator?
You don’t even know the difference between left and right ideologies, so it doesn’t really matter who I bring up, you’re just going to screech “Fascist!”
“Commie bastards” are what i grew up hearing soviets called (i was born just before the end of the Cold War).
My dad still has a knee jerk reaction to anything communist.
As for why socialism is preferred, it’s because communism is authoritarian- which yields too much power to the state. Either side getting authoritarian is bad.
Do you know about the Red Scare? It‘s the systematic negative propaganda towards anything questioning the capitalist system that underpins the US-American existence. And that‘s usually Communism, as that‘s the system in direct opposition to Capitalism.
The knee jerk reaction your dad (but you also, up there) showed is a result of that. One hardly can escape that, as it‘s part of the lived reality.
However, it‘s just that, propaganda. Once you start to realize that, you can take steps to see through it. Here Trump is invoking the same boogeyman to vilify his opposition, even tho it‘s likely not even communist or socialist, but just against the capitalist oligarchy.(Simplified) Communism is a stateless society, where the economic basis of class differences has been overcome. Socialism is one step towards that, it‘s the situation after the means of production, but also stuff like housing have been socialized.
Class difference refers to the contradiction between the exploited working class (any wage laborer, not able to live off of their wealth alone) and the exploiting owning class, the Capitalists (owning the means if production and the land)Communism is a stateless society, where the economic basis of class differences has been overcome.
True in an academic sense, but his clarification makes it pretty obvious he’s referring to the Marxism-Leninism of the USSR since he referenced that directly. Using “communism” as a shorthand for that has been common in both western and eastern media and news since the Cold War. I live in a former satellite state of the USSR, and adherents here would use the same language, it’s not just an outside polemic.
Not really looking to debate the merits of it, but I think pretending not to understand what someone means when they use a very wide and commonly accepted usage of a word and instead pedantically clinging to only an academic definition rather than addressing the actual point is a little obnoxious.
Sorry, what was the actual point you want me to address to not be as obnoxious as you, since you could address it yourself? Obviously I’m replying to a specific aspect of the user’s commentary, which was dehumanizing in nature.
You’re saying that Cuba, DPRK, China are not also recried as Commies? Wonder who’s being pedantic for whatever reason.
Also, Communism and Communists are real things, not solely academic concepts. Reducing it as such is a questionable approach. Why should we adhere to the propaganda of the US to redefine what words mean?
Addressing the point or not isn’t what’s obnoxious; pretending not to understand what is meant by a common, widely accepted usage of a word to shift a discussion towards semantics is. It’s similar to people correcting common use of “theory” to “hypothesis”; these also have distinct meanings, but the common use of “theory” doesn’t really get in the way of discussion… providing people don’t feign not knowing what’s meant when the person has made which they’re using clear. It’s the same here: you knew very well he’s not referring to a stateless, classless society, but rather the communist states of the world.
Again, using “communism” in this way is not purely a polemic and it’s dishonest to characterize it as such. Even here behind the old iron curtain, “communism” as shorthand for “aspirational communism under a vanguard socialist state” is and was extremely common use of the word. Members of the communist parties would refer to themselves and their states as communist all the time. It isn’t “adhering to US propaganda”… all sides used this. It’s really only young, contemporary communists causing a stink over this, honestly.
Why are we calling Republicans “pedophile protectors” instead of just pedophiles
We don’t call serial woman abusers “woman abuser protectors”, we just call them cops
Why both both?
Rapepublicans
The pedophile he is protecting? DJT
Maybe he was upset at the lack of brevity?
The protestor could’ve just clipped it to the one word.
But trump isn’t a pedophile protector as much as he’s an actual pedophile.
And he protects himself, checks out.
What’s another name for a pedophile protector?
Pedophile.
Unfortunately I’ve seen my fair share of non-pedophiles protecting actual pedophiles, under various circumstances, usually emotional manipulation by the pedophiles themselves. Some later realized the damage they helped causing just because someone told them they’re saving a child from “deep poverty” or “letting them go to college in the future without getting into debt”.
The American people have apparently decided that he can do both.
The poor guy has been misunderstood, he wasn’t trying to insult Trump. After Slytherin was renamed to “Hogwarth MAGAs” he has been sent to shield Trump from harm with his “Protecto Pedophilus” spell.
COMMUNISTS want to PROSECUTE PEDOPHILES!
-LITERALLY Republicans!
they are telling on themselves.
Just imagine how much he’d flip out if even a single American had the balls to start a revolt because of his corruption and tyranny, just like our sacred founding documents demand
They would call us “traitors” for doing the most patriotic thing— hurting their delicate fee-fees
what’s frustrating and insane is there may already have been several people who’ve “taken a stand” or tried to revolt in earnest already… but because the entire media ecosystem is captured by elitists, those stories would never get coverage and we’d never hear about them.
the headline would just be something innocuous like:
Local man perishes in officer involved shooting, motive unknown
occupy wallstreet was that time, when the elites knew nothing else was going to happen, they dont expect any serious threat to thier power. as in no rioting, no throwing items, dare i say no excessive physical protesting.
I remember. I was there, for all that was fucking worth.
MSM, and right wing grifters(roegan, j peterson, the manosphere) have hypnotized alot of sexually frustrated men in america.
he’s the pedophile they’re all protecting
Oh man, that was amazing! Thanks for sharing that.
Different youtube front-end: https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=ZaZPiwxPqO4
… And the worst thing that the idiot can think of is that the guy yelling is a “communist” not even a “terrorist”.
More in-depth journalism revealing the facts and truth! /s When did the billionaire-owned, mainstream media become the Enquirer? Titillating headlines with no real substance.
We all need to communicate better. Yeah the pedophiles! Stop them! Agreed. But I am contesting old people who are obviously not pedophiles. They hate roundabouts and change.
We all need to communicate better. Yeah the pedophiles!
Hmm
Okay not the best communication








