Online threats to children are real, but the headlong pursuit of age verification that we’re seeing around the world is unacceptable in its approach and far too broad in scope — and we simply can’t afford to get this wrong.

To be clear, parents’ concerns are valid and sincere. Few people would argue that kids should have unfettered access to adult material, to self-harm how-tos, to social media platforms that manipulate them and expose them to abuse.

But it’s the very depth of those worries that is being cynically exploited. Age verification as is currently being proposed in country after country would mean the death of anonymity online.

And we know exactly who stands to gain: The same tech giants who built the privacy nightmare that the internet is today.

  • moonburster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s been fun lads. Let’s make agreements for where we will touch grass together when this happens. Follow-up events will be decided on location

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think these laws are not for we’ll just get around it or not use services that require it, for now at least.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    It bothers me that we know that this bullshit has nothing to do with the kids and is probably being lobbied by the genocide gang and AI companies, even more that it has become obvious that the only value AI has is mass monitoring, but nobody abords the real issue. We are playing their book.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      99.9% navigate the system and grow up perfectly fine, or fine enough. We shouldn’t have to completely surrender our anonymity for the tiny percentage that went wrong.

      Before the Internet, some people got weird, and in the Internet era, some people are going to go weird. Age verification isn’t going to change that.

      This isn’t about the kids. We all know it.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Kids don’t have unfettered access if they are supervised, lol. And age gating will fail regardless. So it’s a failure followed by another failure, sigh.

    • sircac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Indeed, unfettered in a literal sense cannot happen even with the most minimum supervision, but regardless of the threshold in parenting (I am not going to pardon parents responsibility on this, but good luck asserting 100% supervision), circumventions will always take place, so with more reason it cannot be used the “kids safety” argument to bring Orwellian levels to everybody’s lifes

        • sircac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The theoretical minimum would be sharing any instant of their lives, during which they could not sustain an unfettered access to anything, not like I would consider it a decent minimum in any case (I was revolving around the “unfettered access” concept of the previous comment), but I cannot imagine how it would exists any threshold of supervision above which you can exclude any unfettered access at any given moment of their existence, risk of harmful exposition never drops to zero, so argue an Orwellian measure for the indiscriminate shake of their safety has no sense to me…

      • qqq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s interesting what people expect of Proton Mail. I’ve used it for a long time but for only one reason really: their revenue stream is my subscription and not ads. I’ve never even given a second thought to all their encryption claims. Even with Proton Mail if I ever wanted to send a “secret” email I’d wrap the content in my own personal keys.

        With respect to IP addresses of email logins, I’m surprised they ever claimed they don’t have logs. You’ve always been able to review the IP of a login through the web UI as far as I remember. Was the idea that that was also supposed to be encrypted?

        Personally I’m OK with them complying with court orders, but I understand that “the definition of criminal is state defined” and that poses serious issues. It kinda seems like if you want to do something that could be considered criminal at some point in your life by your country you should consider something other than a 3rd party email provider for those messages. Signal would be a step up in that regard if you still wanted to use a third party.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s interesting what people expect of Proton Mail.

          It’s quite mundane actually: people expect what they advertise on their front page.

          Their advertising is a stretch at the best of times, and (as seen on my first link) so terrible that it needs to be removed at other times.

          • qqq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Lol, ok, fair.

            I guess I see a lot of wiggle room in the marketing speak of their page and I haven’t actually “looked in to” Proton Mail’s claims in a loooong time. So I guess what I really wanted to say is that it’s interesting to me that people take that marketing at face value if they’re actually trying to maintain secrecy. I’ve always just taken it as a given that third party services aren’t particularly good at that, especially as they grow in complexity like Proton has. Signal has been easier for me to believe because of the singular focus and the reputation of the founder in the crypto community; although I guess he’s long gone.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        They have to comply with court orders. You can’t run a business and ignore the government and legal system; they will throw the book at you.

        Don’t use proton to do anything that could be considered a crime in the EU.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          This sounds like something you should take up with Proton’s marketing: “Outside of US and EU jurisdiction”

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    The positive thing about age checks is the technology that will come out to by pass the system.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m working on ways it right now. Aliexpress wants me to do a face check for some items. I’ve been a customer long enough to have been born and become a legal adult as a customer!

      They don’t want my face for verification. It’s an excuse to feed their AI, which is already scary good at voice.

  • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    If this becomes widespread, I just won’t use any websites that require it. There will always be ways around it or alternatives for people opposed to losing their privacy. There already are at least 2 Internets. There’s reddit and Facebook and Twitter and all the corporate news sites, and then there’s Lemmy and archive.org and the dark web and dev pages and independent websites and piracy. I find I rarely care about the former anyway. It’ll just mean being blocked off from all the corporate slop, which may be a blessing in disguise.

    • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am readying myselft for the end of internet since years. I guess we are at the end of the dead internet theory where they have to ID humans to be able to differentiate them from bots and be able yo target them more specifically.

      • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Lol, is that why? Advertising dollars.

        It’s tough for millennials, who saw the potential and the promise of the Internet.

        It’s important to note the Arab Spring and the One Piece (whatever we’ll name it).

        Even now the remnants of the forth estate, are literally vlogging news on tube sites and substack.

        But yeah, Internet is ever inching forward to becoming TV or radio. Centralized information is power.

        I maintain that we lost the Internet when we accepted asynchronous data connection.

  • treesquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Could” is a funny way of saying “are obviously intended to”. Stop playing around, call it out directly. Points where you must have your ID checked are, in fact, ID checkpoints.

  • Randelung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    Man, parents not wanting anything to do with their kids’ upbringing will believe anything, huh. They’d rather offload any and all responsibilities to automation than spend one minute teaching kids how to protect themselves.

    Then again, they probably don’t know, either.

    • FLAGSHIP@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think you’re correct in both aspects for sure. Parents are certainly less involved, for the most part, in informing their kids of literally anything. It is much easier to ‘offload any and all responsibilities’ as you put it. iPad kids are a good example of this. Handing a 2yr old a video device and walking away is not parenting. This is an issue with many many topics from internet safety, to general life things, to talks about their bodies. Parents do not want to parent.

      I’d also agree, largely, the parents just don’t know, or care. Privacy is, unfortunately, a niche thing to know and care about.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I see this as more like the patriot act- gover ent and big tech are pushing to elevate concerns of “the children’s safety” to violate our privacy and sell data. Same way the patriot act is so you can “keep all the evil bad man terrorists” at bay but really it’s an excuse to violate our rights “legally” in the name of “safety”.

    • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s two ways to view what you just said there. Parents aren’t parenting, but you can’t speak for someone elses emotions about it. And it’s more constructive to a problem (rather than adding to it) to ask why, to figure out what’s happening, with compassion, so as to help it be repaired.

      Here’s another example, drug addicts, quite often you will hear people judging and shaming their behaviours, without asking why, or looking at their choices with compassion and an eye to repair the problems for them. Most often, very very abused children, grow up to self medicate their internal agony, caused by what they’ve lived through. You wouldn’t then choose locking them up in jail to help repair.

      You’re talking about kids, maybe some of them go on to be these same drug addicts.

      I would suggest this whole problem with the unsupervised parenting / disconnected parenting is capitalism. And it’s by design.

      People have kids (mostly) because they want them, they love them. I would argue very few would want to be parenting poorly. So why are they?

      Could it be that there’s no opportunity to stay home and raise kids. Raising kids, is work, and it is hard work, has been so hugely devalued, intentionally, so as to be able to remove it as needing space in people’s lives. Who thinks it’s admirable to stay home and raise kids? That is an opinion that has been societally planted, to serve the bourgeois.

      Actual paid work, who can live without working? Multiple jobs, even. That’s also by design.

      Capitalism also designed this system we are all currently using, of a family in a singular home. It wasn’t like that, previously. So no village, no desperately needed support for raising kids.

      Jobs burn you out, we aren’t designed to live like this, but there’s little to no flexibility, and parenting burns you out, and theres little to no support for that, now. Who has energy left after that, to also find all the ways in which tech is attacking this week.

      I would argue, partially, the solve for poor parenting, would be to start rolling out some guillotines.

      But also, raising a kid is supposed to be the job of a village, I’m sure you’ve heard that. To be a good parent, you need a full tank, but all the avenues for refilling your tank have been removed.

      We should all care about fixing this, it is our next generation. I don’t believe hating on the singular parents trapped in this hellhole, is the answer.

    • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have siblings like that. Literally never seen them parent. I’ve changed more of their kids’ diapers than I have seen them do, and I have no kids. It’s kind of irritating in an understatement kind of way. My poor niblings

      • LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        But look at you, being the village, awesome job, stepping in and helping them grow up to be rounded little people. I have 7 niblings, and they’re all a mix of neurodivergence, I’ve been gathering them all and taking them to events and teaching them, playing with them, since day dot. Even though I have kids of my own. It’s so hugely necessary to be in the kids in your life, lives, like that. You can’t parent from an empty cup, and the ability to refill that cup has been removed from us. You taking that time, also gives time for the parents to recharge. You’re amazing, keep it up!

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It seems like a pretty common thing for people to expect that the luxuries of modern technology include not having to do anything you don’t want to, including being present for your own life.

      People make self-destructive choices every day. (insert “always have been” 🌏🧑‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀)

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Basically don’t allow ads for kids and only show social media posts from their friends in chronological order instead of any fancy algorithm. Also make them liable for showing scams to minors. That kills most profit.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Kill it from the other direction. Make it illegal to algorithmically adjust a users experience to prioritize interaction regardless of whether that’s positive or negative. Ultimately that’s the problem with places like Facebook, they weigh an angry rant the same as a positive one, higher even in a lot of cases. Things that make people angry generate a lot more interaction than positive things so it drowns people in hate and fear. If you treat any interaction as a positive signal things just devolve.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Great, now how do you tell who’s an adult?

        They’ll just implement age verification anyway.

          • osanna@lemmy.vg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            i barely used commercial social media (bsky excepted), but when australia brought in the the ID thing, I just didn’t bother going back. I used bsky a lot prior to the social media ban, but last time i logged in, it asked me for ID. I thought “fuck giving my ID to some random fucking company. My GOVT ID!”

              • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Facebook asks for ID nowadays, so does YouTube for adult content I believe. It’s been happening for years. It’s also easier than typing a password if you’re on mobile.

                It’ll be normalised whether or not there’s laws requiring it :/

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This would be awesome. I would buy myself a fake ID again! This time the other direction.

  • AverageEarthling@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, I’ve got boxes full of physical books and self hosted movies and Tv. At that point, I’ll just stop using the internet. I need to go outside more anyway.

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      Finally all my friends that been giving me shit about having a dvd collection can eat shit.

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        I was finally ready to clean out my closet and get rid of all my old movies and games. But now…

      • AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve got a mean collection myself. I have saved every cassette, record , DVD , VHS , book , magazine ( some bit the dust but anything with good info stayed) , zine and CD I’ve ever baught since I was a young teen ( and their many versions of various players for the many formats)

        I’ve had more than a few people appear angry that I have kept all these “things” in my life. Blows my mind that they never saw this coming. …I guess I can rent my dad’s and books

      • gurty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I put my 500+ collection of DVDs into several of those old CD storage sleeves cases you used to see back in the 90s. They are safe and sound, ready for when things go too far.

        • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Disc rot is still a thing. Warner Bros DVDs produced between 2005 and 2009 are especially affected.

          • gurty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            This was fun to zoom in on and check the titles. Also, good to see an All Elite fan in the wild.

            • zewm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’ve been watching wrestling since the late 80s and I enjoy all the promotions. I stopped watching regularly around 2002ish. I came back when AEW debuted. I tried watching WWE but it just lost its spark for me. I keep up with news and clips but I don’t watch the weekly programming.

              Any standout movies?

              • gurty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Cube 2 is an obscure gem for me. I really like ‘where are we and how did we get here?’ horror movies. Not sure if you saw Cube 3 but it was… not aa good, lmao.

                • zewm@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I have only seen the first one, but I did hear Cube Zero was the weakest of the lot.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      My mother in law got me essentially the bible of DIY gardens for the Flemish region. I learned that there are differences just in tool styles an hour drive away from eachother already.

      I could read that for a years and still learn things!

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      The next step will be to make more essential services online only, so people have to use the internet.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Harder to organize protests though. Like if they implement a new renter’s/homeowner tax, or sales tax, or whatever, that means we’d have to sell our books to make ends meet. And then make “digitally inciting” protests illegal too maybe so you don’t feel comfortable even discussing it on your devices. (Not that our opsec today is sufficient, wager it’s not for like 95+% of us, but this feels yet worse)

      Scary stuff

  • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s exactly what they (billionaires) are trying to achieve. Because they’re getting scared of us getting organised and doing more than burning down warehouses.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      its to cut off things like organization, information to keep people ignorant. they only dream of able to turn off internet like iran does to keep people ignorant.