

I think it should require some proof that there was mutual intent to prevent or end a pregnancy, but otherwise it seems reasonable.


I think it should require some proof that there was mutual intent to prevent or end a pregnancy, but otherwise it seems reasonable.


The need for maintenance is forseen, but it’s generally deferred. There was probably a plan to do something every year or two, but they weren’t willing to shut the beach down for a week or so. A second pipe would be absurdly expensive.


That’s where blood is supposed to be.
True, but those kids are on the market for a reason.


How to find a dirty cop: pick up the phone and call the police station.
It’s a bit tougher with kids, where you might not want to move too far from family if they help occasionally.
With 10m you could pretty safely have a 400-500k “income” even for a family of 4 in a high cost city that should be plenty. It’s not Lambo money for a family, but it’s definitely enough to not have a steady job or be able to simply quit at any mild inconvenience.


Texting on my old stratosphere was so much better than the modern keyboards. I wouldn’t mind an updated version.


Halo infinite is technically cross platform between steam and MS, but the integration sucks for managing friends on steam.


They might have better lawyers, but generally the big club of the government is the inevitability factor. Federal departments are basically immortal and have no profit motive to justify the continued budget.


It doesn’t strip power though, it just moves it to something that hits the news cycle multiple times.


This seems shortsighted by these companies. A jury trial is way more expensive and public with a chance of paying as much or more fines anyway. Sure it takes longer to get a ruling, but that seems like a small win.


The actual rules aren’t too terrible, plenty of these garbage patents would be invalidated with any real scrutiny applied to them. The problem is that it’s often cheaper to pay the settlement than the legal bill to fight, which is a more widespread problem that the legal system is too expensive and slow to be accessible to the vast majority of people. There’s also a secondary issue that patent officers are too generous in granting patents, and reform would be great. The problem is they are overworked so they can’t properly evaluate and research applications, and are encouraged to be overly permissive in granting patents.


There are anti-slapp laws to help with this, but they aren’t always used appropriately.


That’s not actually a solid defense as “fictional” characters that are obviously someone that exists can still be ruled libel. A common informal defense is to give the fictional person a small penis. It doesn’t change anything legally, but it does require someone suing you to admit in court that they have a small penis.


He did that in the run up to fable too, but games media wasn’t very widespread then.


What made Doctor Who great was Davie’s writing. It was a good mix of monster of the week, massive story arc, and recurring characters with a monster of the week. Moffat wasn’t quite as good, but was still respectable.
I don’t mind RNG, I mind games that rely on it over proper design. Xcom has tons of RNG, but it’s generally still possible to win most maps with proper strategy. Most roguelikes have this problem where any given run is impossible to win regardless of play.
I do appreciate the games that give you quit and quit to desktop in the same menu.
It’s generally not required to accept change as payment like that.