Sind diese Sachen überhaupt legal in den USA?
Weitgehend. Das ist die berühmte Redefreiheit.
In Deutschland wäre das schon anders. ZB Politiker beleidigen ist heftig strafbar. Natürlich ist das keine effektive Widerstandsmethode, aber die Paragrafen lassen sich natürlich ohne weiteres instrumentalisieren. Man kann Kritiker oder ganze Diskussionsgruppen drangsalieren.
besch. Erkennungsrate
Aha! Also müsste man ganz viele Kapseln nehmen, um das auszugleichen. Wenn das mit dem täglich Brot gehen würde, dann würde das absolut Sinn geben. Man hätte auch die Veränderung im Zeitverlauf im Blick. Natürlich würde man das mit KI auswerten.
Ich denke, der Comic will das Gefühl ausdrücken, dass einem dieser neumodische Scheiß (höhö) völlig sinnlos und vage übergriffig aufgedrängt wird. Leider funktioniert das Szenario für mich einfach nicht.
Ich könnt mir schon vorstellen, dass es irgendwann Spezialessen mit Videokapsel in der Drogerie gibt, als niedrigschwellige Vorsorgeuntersuchung.
Aber ich schätze, der Comic sollte absurd wirken.
If voice cloning violates right of publicity when sound recordings are fed into a model directly,
I doubt that is true.
These things are not internationally standardized. So it very much depends on where you do it.
Q1 is if you are allowed to use a recording for that purpose. This is legal in some places but not in others. I don’t think it has to do with the right of publicity, though.
Q2 is what you are allowed to do with the output. If you fool people about who is talking, then right of publicity enters. It probably does not matter how you imitate the voice, but only if you fool people. If you imitate a voice badly, but deliberately fool an elderly person who is hard of hearing and not quite sharp anymore, then it doesn’t matter if it was a bad imitation.
Parody is probably fine in most places, but standards vary.
It’s wurst case time!
Dieser Link ist vielleicht auch hilfreich.
Unverschämt! Das darf nur die Unterhaltungsindustrie!
Ich weiß, der Witz ist deplatziert im Angesicht der Toten. Wer gesehen hat, was unsere Euro-MAGAs zum Streit zwischen Cloudflare und “Piracy Shield” absondern, weiß, warum ich so drauf bin.
Quad9 is in Switzerland. They also get censored by French courts.
Fully anonymous. No contest.
ID Verification is only about controlling what is published. Here the promise is that it will suppress bots, but that wouldn’t be the only use. Setting up your own little space with ID requirement is absolutely an option. That that’s not the default, tells us that overwhelmingly people do not want that.
Anyone who thinks that people using their real name will behave any better can go to Facebook for a reality check.
Similar to copyright, enforcement requires surveillance and empowers censorship. But worse than copyright, it is directly aimed at information about people. So that is what gets surveilled and censored.
Of course, there are positive uses, such as disappearing revenge porn. But in practice, it will always favor the rich and powerful who have the resources to actively manage their image. I don’t believe it is worth the massive surveillance and censorship apparatus, even before one gets to the obvious potential for misuse.
Have you heard of the recent Russmedia case?
How did free speech help when the Nazis humiliated jews publicly in the 1930s?
How did it help taking “jew-baiters” like Julius Streicher to court during the Weimar Republic? Obviously it didn’t.
It seems obvious that I want the state to prevent hate speech, especially against minorities.
You want the state to act against hate speech coming from the elected head of state. What about that seems like a good plan?
You can’t convince people that Trump is a bad guy, and so you want the state to go after the bad guys. Maybe you can convince people that the state should smash bad guys. It’s not hard. But Trump is in charge of the state and not you. He’ll decide who’s a bad guy.
Really good. I wouldt have given full marks. Semi-precious gemstone isn’t good enough. Too much reliance on the pronunciation. Good pun, though, I feel. Very groan.
Nono, you’re thinking of circumference. This is about a semi-precious gemstone in the shape of a small, domesticated mustelid.
ETA: Maybe it’s too hard. I am thinking of a …
zircon ferret
Nono, you’re thinking of circumlocution. This is about building a wall around a besieged city.
Nono, you’re thinking of a convention. This is about a psychological treatment that makes gay men like women.
Yeah, he has his own Mastodon instance. I was trying to make a different point, though.
People couldn’t even agree to keep Trump away from government, even though that’s a no-brainer. If you react by trying to build a consensus that some people should be banned from social media, you may get that consensus. But it won’t be Trump who is banned. That is a no-brainer, too.
It’s shockingly fascist thinking, actually.
I was going to ramble on about Mediterranean history, but then realized, it was already not short.
Have you ever heard of the 1961 Paris Massacre? It was a peaceful demonstration in a European capital. It ended with the police murdering dozens, maybe 100s.
That puts the civil rights struggles in the USA at the time into quite a favorable context. But one shouldn’t view these events in France solely through the lens of colonialism or American racism, as the countries of southern Europe and northern Africa have Millennia of shared history. It is not like EG the European conquest of the Americas or the slave trade.
Shipping is a very cheap means of transporting massive amounts of cargo (or troops). Currently, the Mediterranean divides Europe from Africa, but that is an anomaly. Historically, it has tied together the countries around the coast, for better or worse. The Roman Empire was based around that sea.
Modern day Algeria was a regular part of France since 1848, like French Guyana today. Or like Hawaii is part of the US. But the inhabitants were very much second class citizens, which was justified through religion. Much of today’s (French) Islamophobia feeds from that history. But do not forget that other countries around the Mediterranean, as well as Russia, also have a history of war and oppression involving Islamic people.
It is real. There is a lot of hypocrisy, particularly among the right. But the difference between Europe and the US is stark.
Compare the criticism of the DMCA or Google’s Content ID to this affair. It’s on completely different levels.
As a European, I’ve really come around to a more American view of Free Speech.
Over the last few years, we get more and more laws requiring more and more surveillance and censorship to protect copyright, stop hate speech, enforce GDPR, … We’re building up this infrastructure and the population thinks it’s fine. The courts go along and ask for more.
What is going to happen when a European Trump comes to power? You think it’s terrible that Big Tech goes along with Trump? That Must bought Twitter? We ain’t seen nothing yet.
Das ist rechtlich ziemlich schwierig. Es kann durchaus strafbar sein. Spätestens das Hochladen ist normalerweise strafbar. ZB eine Meldung heute: https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/niedersachsen/osnabrueck_emsland/polizeikontrolle-auf-tiktok-hochgeladen-18-jaehriger-verurteilt,polizeikontrolle-116.html
Das ist die aktuelle Situation, ohne dass willige Richter sich für einen Unrechtsstaat ins Zeug werfen. Staatsanwälte sind sowieso weisungsgebunden.