So you’re glad you didn’t clarify your opinion because it let you insult others that asked?

In general people understand opinions better when they’re clearly stated. Deprioritizing that in favor of an opportunity to insult others makes you a bully.

Something I pegged you as immediately. Followed by you using every paragraph of your last response to prove me right. Hilarioulsy you did that, btw, starting with:

didn’t think until after writing it that anyone would be this profoundly stupid. Whoops.

Speaking of stupid, I laid a trap saying you would act this way. I even labeled it as a trap. And you still fell into it:

My last sentence:

By ALL means, respond with more insults to prove me right.

You, a hypocritical clown that can’t read:

you didn’t bother to read… you smarmy fucking oaf.

No. I just can’t read what your opinion is. And neither can anyone else. Probably because you admittedly left it unclear to create an opportunity to honk your clown nose.

you’re vapidly pretending to champion.

That’s you, the opposite of a champion, a bully.

I’ve never had a pathetically insecure clown bite so hard on such obvious bait. As intelligent as you think you are, no one will ever give a shit as long as you are a far bigger bully. Behaviour you’ve spent this entire conversation prioritizing over anything intelligent. I can easily learn what you’ve failed to tell me. I doubt you can act civil even after weeks of practice.

Go on and prove me right even more, clown.

Central Park’s early history is shocking to nobody who has, as in the post, a high school or undergraduate-level understanding of US history.

According to your first response, you think you’re an idiot for believing that:

"Local person discovers undergraduate gen-ed courses not designed to teach you literally everything about a subject.

You also now say there were 1600 evictions in central park, implying I’m downplaying that number by simplifying it as “dark,” when you yourself already downplayed that number far far more than I did as:

a village of 225 people… its existence had minimal impact on history going forward. 225 lived there.

So should I not care that only 225 people lived there, or be offended that I described that as “dark?”

You want to explain the math of how 1600 evictions can come from those 225 people?

You’ve literally done nothing but disagree with everyone who talks to you, including yourself. You’re not making a point, you’re punching down to seem better than others.

By ALL means, respond with more insults to prove me right.

You know this person already agrees with you right? Insulting their knowledge doesn’t do much to make them want to know more.

In particular because the point they are making is about the notariety and popularity of central park having such a dark past. Not that it’s the only place in the US with such a history, just one of the most popular. So one would imagine that with such popularity, it’s dark history would be familiar instead of buried like it is elsewhere in the country.

TL:DR: The point is that history can remain buried no matter how popular what buried it becomes. You would think more people would notice what’s underneath.

Yep! Co-op OR single player. Player 2 has an AI that scales as you level, so it’s still very fun as a solo experience 🙂

And it’s a shared screen, kinda like a 2 player beat em up.

And co-op works over Steam remote play. Only 1 copy of the game needed!

Actually, it’s not against the Steam EULA for me to sell Steam keys outside their platform. (As long as it’s me selling directly from my website). There even used to be 3rd party services that provided a way for you to sell your own steam keys on your own website without STEAM getting a cut. Last I checked, that was still an option with them. It’s somewhat of a loophole in their EULA, but they did use to encourage devs to sell keys themselves. Selling them through a third party is what breaks the EULA. But not private sales from the developer themselves.

Steam only has a problem is the dev sells more steam keys on their website then steam. Which I don’t think has happened yet.

Haha, thanks man! Completely understand. Keep us in mind around March 5th for related reasons 😉

Working on that actually! Specifically GoG and more outreach on Lemmy. And thanks for the advice! 🙂

We’re probably going to be deleting our Tiktok soon to likewise reduce use of US tech. Which really sucks because it’s the only place we have any traction atm.

Thank you! 🙂 Works great on Steam deck actually! 🙂 Just need to adjust the auto aim a bit in the options to get the best results.

Hate to ask, but as an Indie dev, I’d love some support:

We made a cartoon network inspired RPG (am ex Cartoon Network dev). It’s called:

Ink Inside

It gets lost in Steam discovery constantly as it’s combat is too unique to classify as more than “action RPG.”

Several 9/10 review scores. Brian David Gilbert as a lead VA, with 11 others

42 reviews on Steam.

If we depose them, we’d have access to their wealth to tackle climate change. And it wouldn’t be for building the doomsday bunkers they are now.

Zuckerberg spent nearly $400 million for a bunker to be built in Hawaii. This was after Hawaii had fires that cost them nearly a billion in damages.

Zucks $400 million purchase could have repaired half the nation-state. It would have immediately improved ecological recovery, and restore the canopy biome that helps pull C02 from the air as a natural deterent to Climate change. He’d then have most of the population worshipping him for doing so. Likely welcoming him anywhere in the state he’d want to visit.

Instead he can now visit his bunker, needs it because the island hates him, and helped contribute to ecological collapse in building it.

The problem is that billionaires are the worst humans imaginable to have such wealth. It will always go towards cthe acceleration of climate collapse for their benefit instead of preventing it. Whether you feel they’re a contributor or not, they’re still in charge of the resources that could easily stop climate change faster than any other mechanism on the planet.

Instead they’re building bunkers with that money to run from the problems they’ve actively contributed to more than any other human on the planet.

Afghanistan and Iraq both had governments the US effectively destroyed and replaced with something worse. They then occupied each of those territories for decades.

Neither had infrastructure, roads, or active US military bases that the EU has. Neither are conveniently located near bodies of water where the US has 7 of the 10 aircraft carriers that exist on the planet. Neither were convenient to invade and dispose the government of, but the US is literally batting 1000 on doing that to whatever nation it wants no matter how remote and inhospitable its terrain.

That’s what you should be taking away from Afghanistan. Not that the US occupied it, that they easily fucked it up for generations. Something they’re now doing domestically, and loudly announcing they want to export.

Now do the US since they’re likely going to be the ones at the front of the attack on the EU.

That’s the point he’s making. Just subtly. As not to disturb the very thin skin of the US leader in charge of the world’s largest active military with bases across the world.

If you don’t want to talk to me, then stop. Not that pedos like you know how.

Nope. I’m listening to an idiot trying to convince me the opinion of a verifiable child rapist is true without using any form of critical thinking or evidence.

Imo, the question is who fires the first shot. If it’s Minnesota PD, Trump will engineer them into the enemy and have a larger pool of people believing him.

If it’s ICE, and continues to be ICE, they will continue to lose support, and more importantly, continue to lose in the hearts and minds of those knowing where this is going.

As long as ICE keeps shooting first and asking quastions later, when things eventually escalate, they will meet the largest amount of resistance instead of the weakest.

Let the antagonizers make it clear who is antagonizing, and you absolutley will have a resistance.

At this point, I think we’re 1 more ICE shooting away from every American with a gun showing up to the Capitol to peacefully protest the same way it was done Jan 6th.

I agree with everything you said. HOWEVER.

No police officer wants to be the one that gets the 10th Amendment challenged in court. These rules you described only exist UNTIL they are challenged.

Do you want them to be challenged given the current SCOTUS?

I don’t. As it would be a literal constitutional crisis. One that our currupt SCOTUS would forever change the norms of given the opportunity. State police are making sure they aren’t the ones providing said opportunity.

Because once SCOTUS corrupts the constitution, we will be actively in a civil war between their interpretation of the constitution, and what was before.

I’m aware of what the rules are. I’m also aware of how most of them have changed through Trumps court and likely will continue to given any and all opportunity.

It’s wise to not give them any.

No shit. Words scare fascists like you. Real Americans fight for words to be said, even if they don’t like em.

Thanks for making it very clear which of these two categories your behaviour is in to everyone but you.

If you want a real answer instead of knee jerk hatred towards cops:

Cops are local police, and have local authority. They do not have jurisdiction or authority over federal agencies.

If they moved on ICE, that would literally start a Civil War. As law would become the word of local authority versus federal authority in determining who has any.

The officers in Minnesota are not defending ICE. They’re trying their best to not be the ones that start the Civil War ICE is trying to.

Because ICE has federal authority, anything local authority does will create a conflict that ICE and Trump will use to justify martial law. They want to use our military to invade swing states, so the Police in Minnesota are trying to prevent that through not openinly engaging with ICE agent provocateurs.

The is solid evidence that both of these men raped child sex slaves.

Nope. There isn’t. You’re lying. Show the evidence for Clinton like I ready did Trump. Show the evidence you claim you have for Clinton, or you are supporting fasicm, not justice. Period.

I already know your response will just be more anger instead of any proof of what you’re angry about.

So show me your anger doesn’t come from a fucking vibe, and maybe then I’ll believe your bullshit righteousness isn’t bullshit.

Until then, I’ll take your lead and assume the worst of you.

That you’ve fully given up American values in exchange for vibes. As easily proven by you actively calling for the unfair persecution of a man you can’t even prove is guilty. Something I guarantee you will fail at providing in your next response.

Once that happens, you are again choosing to defend fasicm instead of growing up enough to know what it looks like.

Respond with your “solid evidence,” or you’re asking for fasicm not justice. Something I didn’t have a problem with because I’m right.