QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes@hexbear.netEnglish · 3 years agoDeterminism Wlemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square117linkfedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down10
arrow-up1100arrow-down1imageDeterminism Wlemmygrad.mlQueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes@hexbear.netEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square117linkfedilink
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 years ago Your position from the first comment is free will and determinism both exist. Are you sure about that?
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years ago Dialectical materialism holds that both are at work but that material conditions are dominant. Am I supposed to take “both” to not include “free will?”
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 years agoYou’re supposed to review your claim to see whether it’s accurate.
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agoWhat claim do you want me to review?
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agoI stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 years agoDo you really not know what I’m challenging you on?
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agoThe question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 years agoI guess that’s a yes lol
Are you sure about that?
Am I supposed to take “both” to not include “free will?”
You’re supposed to review your claim to see whether it’s accurate.
What claim do you want me to review?
The one I quoted
I stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.
Do you really not know what I’m challenging you on?
The question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?
I guess that’s a yes lol