QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes@hexbear.netEnglish · 3 years agoDeterminism Wlemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square117linkfedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down10
arrow-up1100arrow-down1imageDeterminism Wlemmygrad.mlQueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes@hexbear.netEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square117linkfedilink
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agoI stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 years agoDo you really not know what I’m challenging you on?
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agoThe question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 years agoI guess that’s a yes lol
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agoThis conversation has gone all over the place, I don’t know what point you were originally trying to make.
I stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.
Do you really not know what I’m challenging you on?
The question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?
I guess that’s a yes lol
This conversation has gone all over the place, I don’t know what point you were originally trying to make.