Which is your preferred messaging app? I just want some insights about these two.

You may share other messaging apps too.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    Completely different use cases.

    Matrix is shared interest groups.

    Signal is for personal communication.

  • listless@lemmy.cringecollective.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    Do you want it to be so complicated that no one you know in real life is able to use it for more than two weeks before they make some kind of mistake or change that deletes their entire message history and identity? Matrix

    Do you want a slim chance that friends and family might use it, but you have to listen to privacy nutjobs tell you your app is a CIA NSA PsyOp and you might as well cc: potus(at)whitehouse(dot)gov all your messages, it’s run by an american non-profit obviously it can’t be trusted? Signal

  • phanto@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is how I explained Matrix to my mom: its like an email address, but for chat. You can chat at me, even if we aren’t using the same server, like someone can send an email from Gmail to Hotmail. She got set up and promptly went back to texting me every dang time.

      • BladeFederation@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s why the removed it actually, people think being the default SMS app means you’re actually sending encrypted messages now. Nope, it just means you’re sending regular old SMS but with thr Signal app.

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          That’s an extreme minority though. The only people who use Signal are privacy and security conscious people and the people who those people forced to use signal. For the second group, they couldn’t care less if it’s encrypted or not, for the first group, they will make sure what’s a Signal message and what’s a regular SMS message.

          This mythical user that accidentally sends an SMS message when they meant to send a Signal message doesn’t exist.

          • sculptor0725@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            That user might be in the slim minority but they do exist and I appreciate them taking that into account and taking seriously the security of people who aren’t super technical.

          • BladeFederation@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            But then the only use case is if you literally take someone’s phone, switch the default SMS app to Signal, and they don’t know how to switch it back themselves. If they’re that tech illiterate, they’ll probably call you for tech support as to why text isnt working, instead of switching to Signal. And even if they then agree to do it your way, the mythical user you described is no longer mythical, it is easier to make a mistake in the Ui for someone tech illiterate. You will often see a person’s phone number in their Signal profile, after all, it’s not unthinkable.

            Also, as time goes on, more people start using Signal as more people see how fascist some governments are getting and how intense social engineering is with spam calls/texts/whatnot. I know a random 60 year old bus driver who switched to Signal and made other privacy changes like turning on Safari’s relay because her accounts got hacked and she was using the same password for everything. To someone that is blind Googling something they don’t have context for, Signal is a trusted encrypted app, therefore anything I send through Signal should be trusted. I don’t think it is as impossible as you think. And again, to what benefit? There is some benefit to prevent Google possibly scanning your messages, but there are also plenty of other SMS apps which can avoid this, if it is avoidable at all.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Try Delta Chat, it’s even more like email but for chat (it runs off off Chatmail relays, it’s literally email but for chat).

      But more importantly it’s easier to use, I’d have to set my mom up on Matrix but on DC I just sent her the invite link, she downloaded the app and made an acct (and may have had to click the link a second time to get to me but still), it was easy as hell! Then next time we were together I had her open her phone and I set her up with a few extra relays for redundancy. And she actually uses it now! It’s basically a whatsapp clone UI wise so I guess that helped, and at first she’d text me and I’d reply on DC until she started remembering DC exists.

      My dad’s a bit better, all I had to say was “it’s encrypted” and he made an acct and hasn’t used SMS with me since lol.

  • ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    I actually prefer XMPP. It’s also less of a hassle to set up than Matrix and the protocol is much more mature. There are still issues, but it’s rather functional for audio and video calls (if you’re using a supported client).

    Edit: For clients, I use Cheogram on Android and Profanity (which is a TUI) or DinoX (for calls) on Linux.

        • InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          For one thing, it still has the option for an additional fingerprint lock to open the app.
          Sure, my phone itself is locked anyway, usually.
          I still like having the second lock built into the app itself for the odd time (however rare) that I hand my unlocked phone to someone.
          I know they’re not snooping into my signal messages while I blink or misclick on a notification or whatever.

          It may not be a big deal for some/most but I like that feature and I can’t imagine that’s something that needs much upkeep once initially implemented.

          I’m sure it’s not the only feature, but it’s one I use often.

  • undrwater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Only because nobody answered with this one:

    IRC

    Decentralized and an open protocol. Client setup to connect is not so straightforward, but it’s a one and done. Very robust.

    I’m allergic to centralized communication schemes, though I do use signal to communicate with one person.

    I want to research some of the other suggestions that have been brought up, so thank you for the post!

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ve come to distrust Matrix, the metadata leaking is one thing but then combine that with the fact that .org is basically the default server and you almost have to federate with it, and they were started as an Amdocs project before spinning off into “the matrix foundation,” and Amdocs is Israeli, and while I don’t have PROOF they’re connected with Mossad I’d rather not chance it.

    Plus, the apps all sucked last I used them, Element was the best and it was still buggy as all hell, and the Linux app is just an electron wrapper, and it was too hard to use for most of my “normal” friends (I agree, they should get good, but they do not get good, what should I do hold 'em at gunpoint and install Fedora, my options are limited). And the rooms had such a bad CP spam problem they stopped them from being publically searchable, you (now still?) have to know the room’s addr to join. Even still, with that CP problem, it becomes hard to reccomend family/friends to make an account. I don’t want to see that, I don’t want them to have to see that, and I don’t want them to think I want to see that and judge me because of spam in the RasPi room because I’m the guy that recommended the app, I don’t need that in my life.

    Signal requiring phone numbers is also not my favorite, and the single point of failure is not the best either. Better than Matrix imo, but still. Also last I used it they still supported SMS and when a contact would delete Signal without deleting their account, the message would still try to deliver through Signal instead of defaulting back to SMS, so I’d have to switch my default to Messenger every time I wanted to talk to them and back to Signal when I was done. That was annoying.

    Now happily using Delta Chat, easy onboarding for “normals,” low (no?) metadata leaks, webXDC seems cool, p2p video/audio calling, multi-relay support for resiliency, groups (but anyone can kick anyone, they’re meant for known contacts or family more than matrix-like rooms), no discoverability so nobody gets your acct by just having your phone number or etc (so my friend doesn’t have to worry about their abusive ex finding them on it like on IG or Snapchat), due to those last two things it doesn’t seem to have the same CP problem as Matrix rooms, channels are pretty neat, you can share location for increments between 30min and 24hr, bunch of cool stuff!

      • TWeaK@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        The CIA financed Signal (I believe they stopped a few years ago), however that was never really secret. It also happened in simpler times, in the earlier days of internet and mobile phones. In general it’s quite plausible that the CIA just wanted a really secure comms system that people they wanted to undermine regimes could use.

        Contrast this with how the FBI and the Australian feds bankrolled Anomphones, which they then used to read the communications of criminals. That was kept secret until they were ready to brag about it.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Ehhhh idk, afaik jury’s still out on that, but imo “could be.”

        That’s partly why I use Delta Chat instead actually. Only partly, but it makes the list.

        Even still, gun to my head, I think I’m picking Signal over Matrix as far as who I trust a little more. Not that I trust either entirely, and DC I trust more than both of those, but there’s always the possibility of some vulnerability if not a full backdoor. At least DC is FOSS and decentralized, I honestly doubt there’s a “backdoor,” but never know who has a 0-day.

  • Lionel C-R@lemmy.coupou.fr
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    I prefer matrix for two main reasons:

    • I can host my own server (and I do)
    • It’s not centralized

    As a bonus it has briddes for almost anything you can think of, so I use the signal bridge.

  • BladeFederation@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Signal is more stable & simple to set up. So for its intended use, getting people to actually talk to me on it, it’s better.

    Matrix is obviously better as a Discord replacement. It doesn’t require a phone number which is also good. Not centrally managed so easier to decouple from big tech corruption. So it is better in those ways.

  • BaraCoded@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    I feel uneasy about Signal being an app centralized in the USA, but it is the only one streamlined enough to be usable by non tech-savvy friends and family. I wonder if it will fall prey to Chat Control in Europe, so the time to explore alternatives will soon be upon us.

    So far, I have heard of XMPP, Matrix, Delta chat and SimpleX. Never got friends to switch to XMPP or Matrix for more than one conversation, so I guess we’re just f*cked.

    • jksalcedo@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Me neither. In fact, all my friends and almost all people here are only using Messenger and Telegram.

  • kixik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    xmpp + omemo. Signal is centralized, matrix leaks tons of metadata to sync between services…

  • Christopher@lemmy.grey.fail
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    So, I host a Matrix Stack and I bridge to Signal (and Discord). It’s the best of both worlds – all my messages funnel through one application.

    Seeing as you’re using Lemmy/PieFed, I’m going to guess you’ve got a handle on how federation works. I’d suggest Matrix.

    • Hexarei@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      With your bridging to discord, do you have dm capabilities? Able to join servers you don’t control? Because I’m nervous about the idea of getting banned for puppeting since I have multiple big servers I’m in charge of

      • Christopher@lemmy.grey.fail
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes, to all points. I’ve backed out of busy or large servers primarily because I didn’t care about them. Control is granular enough to join specific channels, as well. I don’t know that anyone can even tell I’m bridged.