• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          you mean… sidewalks? because those are very clearly sidewalks; as they are narrow, made of concrete, and there’s absolutely no sign that bikes are allowed or were considered in the design.

          I mean just look at the crossings, those are explicitly pedestrian crossings lol.

          • GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Not at all, pedestrians roadways.

            We bicyclist cannot accept less, I live where yes, sidewalks are rare & available in more quality in the nearest cities, but they are minimum & not wide enough. We must demand better.

            Our (I assume) country is more wealthy, than Scandinavian countries, yet they have better separation & whole roadways converted for non-motorized cyclist & can be used to get to more place, where I live such roadway is 15-miles away, with traffic from my home it takes 45-Mins. to get to it & it only goes along side US1 & connects to Metrorail’s first Southern Station & Metrobus station. I think letting other non-motorized ways for pedestrians to get around is okay.