The mind boggles with the sheer absurdity of this administration, and it’s not poised to improve. Be safe, y’all!

  • Cybrpwca@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    On one hand, the implication is funny. On the other hand, facts and logic have never stopped fascists before.

    • CaramelJalapeño@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would have gone with Despot instead of Monarch.

      Our president is a very naughty girl and needs to be punished. Might need to get that put on a t-shirt.

  • Kwakigra@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Donald Trump made himself the first female president on day 1 by a sex-redefining executive order. He did the thing his supporters imagine Democrats would do.

  • Commiunism@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    For as much as they ask what a woman is to “own the overcomplicated transgender ideology”, it’s so funny that they seemingly don’t know either

  • optissima (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am bothered that everyone seems to be misunderstanding this. You have no gametes at conception, they come later. Everyone in the country is agender/genderless.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        ___ means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the ___ reproductive cell

        Scientifically, it’s nonsense. There is no uniform line to be traced from “conception” to “reproductive cell”.

        Demagogically, a malicious interpretation could mean “only those who, through their genotype, could be traced from conception to reproduction, are a person”.

  • Sina@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s really sad that Elon did not know that we are female at conception.