It would be Useful for doing a retrospective on whether AI is helpful or not

I find it funny the Americans still think they are on top because of their relative “quality of living” to an impoverished state. May the century of humiliation commence!

It’s good for the artists, popularity is decided by the masses instead of a channel. But it’s bad for share holder value.

“Oil is flowing” they say while our emergency oil reserves are at an all time low. “They will have a missile logistics problem” they say while our own missiles are practically depleted. “It’s about endurance” as our sailors try to kill themselves. It’s existential for Iran, they are not going to surrender.

Epstein class wants to make sure the people doing the investigation are understanding…

There are far more conservatives in academia than actual leftists. And there are more liberals in academia than both groups combined. See Catherine Liu for an example of an actual leftist in academia who speaks on this dynamic.

I’m sure Bibi gave them a stern lecture and then took them out for ice cream after

One problem with electing dems that can’t defend common sense policies like Medicare for all, or don’t do a genocide is that if they don’t have the communication skills to sell good policies then they don’t have the communication skills to defend who they are. It’s a problem of their own making.

Broken clock etc etc

Because it would be immensely stupid

“Use this one trick to lower your gas prices at the pump”

Isreal trying their best to prove the antisemites are right

And Trump did not get half the votes, he got the most.

Yes and no. I am still upset Biden didn’t hold Trump accountable for the insurrection.

Then they should join the DSA or some adjacent worker party. Telling the dems you won’t vote for them because of X will get the response of “the GOP will punish you for not voting for us”

Talk about a loss for all those who voted for irresponsible use of AI /s

And “States” when some are barely

This is what share holder value looks like.

So I don’t need to engage in the behavior you deride in order to be lumped into a group you define by that behavior. Did I get that right? Seems like an effective way to avoid challenging ideas, but boy are you telling on yourself.

If she said “Trump is cancelling Thanksgiving for many families because his war in Iran is driving up grocery costs” it would have been a slam dunk.