

You’re right about 2016, but in 2020 republicans saw a collapse in the white suburban vote (from 54%-38% in favor of R in 2016 to 51%-47% in favor of R in 2020). The collapse of support in that group was the margin Republicans lost the election on.
It appears the US is also going to have the largest gender gap in voting in the nation’s history this election, so it “makes sense” that the democratic party who is entirely unwilling to decouple from its genocide platform has chosen this sole route as their theoretical victory. The more baffling thing is that they’ve identified this new core group they need to win but don’t even message effectively (abortion) on this flip wedge issue.
In case it wasn’t abundantly clear I think all of these people are monsters- just trying to provide the analysis of how the democrats think they may possibly win.



The collapse rhetoric isn’t because if the 54->51% R support in isolation, it’s more so that D support in the suburban whites group went from 38->47% as well over the course of 4 years.
Broader point understood though. In a uniparty bourgeois democracy like the US with such an intentionally stunted electoral system the boundaries of electorally viable candidates are defined by the capitalists way, way before any candidate thinks about running for a primary ticket.
It’s why when you see actual on-the-issues polling you get results like you’d expect in the or 60s-40s splits for issues but once capitalists create the electoral abstractions around elected government you see election-gridlock in favor of non-populist-action which results in the coinflippery you call out and downstream austerity measures and further privatization of services.