I thought it was a little too “Hollywood”.

By “still talks“, I mean, still talks in his autobiography, which was written years upon years later, when he was already supposedly sober and probably in his early 40s.

Here’s the thing though: he did mention it in his autobiography, which was written years later after this event happened. And his tone was still nonchalant. So whether he “regrets” ever mentioning it or not, it still doesn’t change the way with which he wrote about it when he was already in his early 40s.

I get it. And I think that’s what it was for people. But I still don’t fully “get” it because it was like any other rock stars autobiography: debauchery, sex, drug use. I guess people like reading about those.

Yea, I think that part is the worst. The fact that he still talks about it nonchalantly is gross.

Yes!!! The biggest red flag is not that it happened, it’s his tone of recalling these events.

I think it has more to do with the tone with which he recalls the incident. There is no regret or acknowledgment of how inappropriate that was.

Absolutely! I hear people saying about how good this autobiography is.  But I don’t know what the hell they’re talking about. It’s written in such a flat tone, it sounds like he was bored himself while writing it. 

Me too

I actually checked and you may be right.

I think there’s an extra chicken in the 2nd line.

I hate that she looks like an insta-hoe

Everybody was filthy back in those days.

I do agree with you. While the health concerns with dogs are valid, I do feel like there should be some designated dog friendly places. It can get really difficult to arrange your schedule around so that the dog doesn’t stay at home for too long. I live with my mom and my boyfriend, and we almost never go places with the 3 of us as a group.

Also, health issues aside, as far as being disruptive, I feel like kids can be just as disruptive. With so many businesses disallowing dogs, it can sometimes feel like you’re almost being punished for having a dog.

Right. But the point people are trying to make is that the title is somehow “misleading”.

I feel like fast doesn’t change anything. “Surrender or die” is not very “peac-y” whether you’re in Kursk or somewhere else.

I’m Ukrainian living in the US, I know.

And yet, there are idiots all over social platforms who bitch (and even joke!) about how they’re “tired of giving money to Ukraine). I only wish they knew how painful that is to see. I wish that they at least had the courtesy to keep their mouth shut.

I mean, just look at the comment fro the user “Ryan” to a post about a new schedule at the visitor’s center:

If you have trouble opening, I’ll copy and paste.

OP from Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Park:

“NEW VISITOR CENTER HOURS FROM THE Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks official Facebook Account . . .

Schedule update!

The adjusted schedule for visitor centers are as follows:

⛺️ Foothills Visitor Center is open Wednesday – Sunday from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.

🌳 Giant Forest Museum is open Friday – Tuesday from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.

⛰️ Kings Canyon Visitor Center is open Thursday – Sunday from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.”

This one guy responds: “This sure seems like a lot of cuts given the limited number of job losses that I’ve read about. Is this just a political statement? While I wish the federal government would spend more on parks, I’m questioning my substantial donations at this point if efforts aren’t being made to make the best of the situation.”

To be fair, a lot of the do lean blue and are livid. But there are a lot of angry boomers on FB.

Yea, it’s heartbreaking to see comments like “I’d rather [xyz] than give another billion to Ukraine.” Just no words. I wish these people at least had the courtesy to shut the fuck up.