The model exists already — abstaining from using it doesn’t make the energy consumption go away. I don’t think it’s reasonable to let historic energy costs drive what you do, else you would never touch a computer.
- 0 Posts
- 26 Comments
The point is that OP (most probably) didn’t train it — they downloaded a pre-trained model and only did fine-tuning and inference.
Running a 500W GPU 24/7 for a full year is less than a quarter of the energy consumed by the average automobile in the US (in 2000). I don’t know how many GPUs this person has or how long it took to fine tune the model, but it’s clearly not creating an ecological disaster. Please understand there is a huge difference between the power consumed by companies training cutting-edge models at massive scale/speed, compared to a locally deployed model doing only fine tuning and inferencing.
jfrnz@lemm.eeto
politics @lemmy.world•Dem Senator Says Party Needs to Stop Attacking ‘Oligarchy’ and Focus on Losing ‘Woke’ Reputation
1·1 year agoSure, but I would say it’s a good thing to focus on for a minority political party.
jfrnz@lemm.eeto
politics @lemmy.world•Dem Senator Says Party Needs to Stop Attacking ‘Oligarchy’ and Focus on Losing ‘Woke’ Reputation
16·1 year agoYea but opposing ‘kings’ isn’t even close to the problem of ‘oligarchs’
I don’t disagree, but for the sake of elections, they’re effectively equivalent. I agree the billionaires are most of the problem, but their names aren’t on the ballot. It’s the guy who is trying to play king.
jfrnz@lemm.eeto
politics @lemmy.world•Dem Senator Says Party Needs to Stop Attacking ‘Oligarchy’ and Focus on Losing ‘Woke’ Reputation
219·1 year agoThe article title is incredibly misleading. Even the first sentence of the article makes clear what she was actually saying:
Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) has urged her Democratic colleagues to stop attacking the “oligarchy” on Thursday, arguing that the word did not resonate with most Americans and should be replaced with “kings.”
She’s advocating for using a more relatable term, not for a change in party values. The “woke” comment irks me, but again is focused on terminology and not ideology.
When you need the dumb fucks’ votes, you gotta speak their language. Or at least water it down to be palatable to someone who was “educated” in our broken-ass system.
Besides the Tesla, none of these are easily achievable by a non-executive working at Apple at age 33.
You’re on first shift duty
jfrnz@lemm.eeto
News@lemmy.world•Former Rep. Katie Porter launches run for California governor
21·1 year agoWhat hate did he spew?
jfrnz@lemm.eeto
politics @lemmy.world•Thousands “Stand Up for Science” Across the Country
4·1 year agoI want them to have to explain their idiotic opinion so they can fail to defend it
jfrnz@lemm.eeto
politics @lemmy.world•Thousands “Stand Up for Science” Across the Country
3·1 year agoWhat do you mean?
I would never claim that China is performing less surveillance of its citizens. They definitely are a world leader in this, in a very bad way.
However, mindless commenters spamming social credit demerits on any post that mentions China only serve to feed the exaggerations and inaccuracies.
Fine, what national security obligations are US-based social media companies meeting that TikTok/ByteDance is not?
Like what? What are American companies required to do to protect your privacy that TikTok doesn’t do because they are a Chinese company?
There has been a widespread misconception that China operates a nationwide and unitary social credit “score” based on individuals’ behavior, leading to punishments if the score is too low. Media reports in the West have sometimes exaggerated or inaccurately described this concept.
Conservative thinktanks (National Center for Public Policy Research) be conservative thinktanks. Despite all the other major corps rolling back DEI programs, it’s nice to see the likes of Apple and Costco pushing back against the right wing nutjobs. Not sure if they’re doing so for profits or morals, but I’ll take either at this point.
jfrnz@lemm.eeto
News@lemmy.world•Thousands of Los Angeles homeowners were dropped by their insurers before the Palisades Fire
181·1 year agoWhy should my tax dollars be used to bail out someone who bought a multimillion dollar home in a high risk area? Why should home owners get all the profits from owning but get to skirt the risks?
I try to stay practical about it. A screwdriver manufacturer is not an arms dealer. But if your work only has value in the violent world of war, then I think it’s worth asking yourself if you’re comfortable with that. I don’t always disparage people that are, even though I certainly couldn’t stomach it.
My rule of thumb is to ask whether the defense industry is the only customer for the product. The company I work for does sell some to defense, but the products were not designed with defense as the primary purpose. It still doesn’t feel great to me, but I’m finding it increasingly difficult to avoid defense funding nowadays.





Now do ICE!