Even if there were tools that can dictate what is AI-generated and what not, they’d have to rely on a pattern, or on an artifact from AI-generated imagery (which, as far as I know, does not exist), and that is what can be used as proof, not the result of the tool itself being used.
Computer Guy
- 2 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: June 4th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Computer Guy@beehaw.orgto
Gaming@beehaw.org•Any good online multiplayer that are discountes on steam?
1·3 years agoThey’re not really DLCs, just cosmetic packs that you can get if you play for long enough. The actual DLCs are the seasonal updates.
Computer Guy@beehaw.orgto
Gaming@beehaw.org•Describe a game in 5 words or less, and see if anyone can guess it.English
1·3 years agoHunting Down The Freeman?
Computer Guy@beehaw.orgto
Technology@beehaw.org•With the decline of twitter and reddit, it's time to take a look at RSS again if you haven't already.English
1·3 years agoBlue’s News, IGN and a local news reporter.

But then, it begs the question, how would you prove it’s an AI work? For all anyone knows, it’s my art, I made it, it’s undistinguishable from what I could make. What the court will see is, I submitted that art in the Internet, you take that, I sue you for copyright, you argue it’s an AI work, and the Court will request you to prove it really is an AI work, and perhaps launching an investigation on me to see whether I really made the AI artwork.