Talentless Sculptor

If the prophet is supposed to have infallible morals, they can’t be time sensitive.

Note that I am taking a page out of your book now by not responding to your questions.

She is not a historian. She is a former child actor turned journalist, think tank contributor and Islam romantic.

You are quoting a 13 year old guardian article written by Myrian Francois “In 2003, at the age of 21, François became a Muslim after graduating from Cambridge. At the time, she was a sceptical Roman Catholic. She rejects the use of the words “convert” and “revert” as “exclusionary”, describing herself as “just Muslim”.[51]” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myriam_François#Personal_life

She also disregards the narration of Aisha herself in Sahih Muslim and Sahih Al Bukhari - Both narrations claiming that she was 6 when she married the Prophet and 9 when the marriage was consummated.

Are you a moral relativist?

I’m not sure you’d even call it flawed morals if their moral beliefs were compatible with the society they lived in.

This is moral relativism. Are you as, I have to assume, a Muslim also a moral relativist? Was the Prophet right to have sex with a child then because it was socially acceptable at the time, or will it always be right to have sex with a child because the Prophet is the most moral person ever to have lived and his morals will never be wrong?

So you are saying that the authors of the Quran and the Prophet whom inspired them to write, had flawed morals?

Hang on, are you saying Caesar or Caesar?

Caesar*

Baby carriers!

Not in this situation, this is why people say “Jew is both a religion and an ethnicity!!!” when talking about European “Jews”: because many/most of them are and self-identify as atheist, they just mean they have European ancestry that at some point actually believed and don’t wanna let go of that identity label for whatever reason. I guess it’s very American? Haven’t we all heard of them being “Italian” because someone in their lineage at some point came from Italy but today they eat spaghetti with ketchup?

Are you saying that Jews as a religious group do not exist and are not persecuted because a lot of ethnic Jews are atheist?

And I wouldn’t say it’s a competition

Good.

but when the biggest guns and bombs are consistently aimed and dropped on the same group, and it’s not the one people keep talking about, something is fishy.

Good thing this isn’t happening then. We are CONSTANTLY, talking about Palestine. YOU were the one who said “Also, the only religious group I ever see actually be persecuted/harassed is Muslims, lol,”. Do you agree that this is false?

Ah, so it is a competition? We are only counting the MOST persecuted religious group? Also putting religious group in quotation marks when talking about Jews isn’t a dog whistle of any kind is it?

Excuse me? The only group being harassed/persecuted is MUSLIMS? Have you ever heard of this group of people called the “Jews”?

Hell even the Christians in Africa are currently being slaughtered in their tens of thousands.

Don’t listen to that dude. He is a poor representation of atheist/non-religious people.

And I think a person who just makes empty claims about how “dumbass”(the fact that you contract dumb and ass makes me think German or Swedish) someone is, they are probably not blessed with an abundance of intelligence themselves.

I think you live in a part of the world where you have very few problems. That is generally the case when people get incredibly upset about things that very rare and or very seldom affect them.

Why the fuck would I ever want the acceptance of a bigot?

How am I a bigot? Because I don’t agree with you?

It’s not politics, you’re talking about actual people.

Of course it is political and cultural. How we construct gender is incredibly cultural and therefore political.

You’re actively trying to dehumanize people.

How is saying that x group of people are mentally ill, in any way, making them LESS human. Are cancer patients or suicidal people LESS human?

Your faux civility doesn’t hide your vileness, we see you. You acting like a jilted saint isn’t for us, those are just for yourself, because you’re dumb enough to eat your bullshit, I’m not. Maybe try to reconnect with those ideations, we’d all benefit from them, including you.

I am not quite sure what you are trying to say here. I get that you think my civility is disingenuous, but it seems like English isn’t your first language. I apologize, but I don’t follow the rest.

I am just assuming this isn’t directed at me since you are a non-reader. So shouting into the void I go.

k

Cool. Thank the non-extant god I don’t suffer from suicidal ideations any more then. Otherwise your words might have had the effect you intended. I won’t extend the same sentiment toward you because I know that some people have very small tolerances that keep them walking among us. I don’t wish death even on those who staunchly hold different political opinions to what I do. That is one fundamental point at which we differ.

I’ll be here if you ever change. Your words won’t change that.