No you fucking weren’t. You were just spamming about free speech because you just wanted to regurgitate whatever talking points you read and didn’t care to notice that I never once said otherwise.

Have a good one hombre, I don’t think it’s worth continuing any “conversation” here.

Glad you finally realized you have nothing remotely worth saying. Good riddance.

This is a free speech issue, the free market dictates they can do as they please.

I never said otherwise you fucking retarded imbecile. Get with the fucking conversation or stop spamming your moronic shit.

Ahh, I didn’t realize you were just pro-corporate censorship via advertiser interest. Should’ve lead with that. See, not all of us agree that advertisements having such a major sway in what we all see is a good thing.

You, if you’ve already forgotten, called musk a “manchild” for not just doing what advertisers wanted. When you were asked why the advertisers are not also “manchildren” for crying about what’s on Twitter, you just tried to change the topic to free markets. Nobody, anywhere, was saying that the advertisers were not allowed to pull out. You were asked a question of value about their choice to pull out.

True that

Thisbis hardly news, no? Didn’t Disney admit years ago that they were actively prioritizing DEI in that leaked call from upper management? Or am I thinking of something else they did

All 3 of these comments I’m quoting were in response to comments making honest argument

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Removed by mod

This is just overwhelmingly false on just about every manner. Try getting your information from somewhere other than r/politics

The explanation is that I don’t give a fuck about race, and don’t consider disparate outcome to be an issue, nor a symptom of disparate policy. You’re the one who’s decided that race is what you want to obsess over. Not me

No, your obsession with race, and assumptions that everyone else just must be as obsessed as you is the only interesting thing here

I mean there’s not much to say. You’re basically just trying to explain that you didn’t serve me a plate of human shit, it’s actually dog shit, from only purebred poodles. Cool distinction, I still don’t want to eat shit.

But all of that is nuance, and you don’t often get that around here.

All the nuance in the world doesn’t matter when it’s just different flavors of shit.

We arent focused on skin color. You’re just the ones picking everything apart based on it, and acting like everyone else must be just as obsessed as you are.

Lmao tell me you’re just posting outrage without reading the article without telling me.

If you had been bothered to read before making a retarded quip, you’d notice that the rejection by judge was because the ballot measure was not specific enough, and was just meant to tack a bunch of stuff on such that it could get passed simply by being attached to a different issue.

If you don’t see why that’s not how things should run, I only assume you’re the one person on earth who isn’t a corrupt politician that just absolutely salivates over every god awful omnibus bill with hundreds of riders for random garbage

Why is more government always the answer?

As if you’d know anything about it

I don’t care about how you think I look bub

and IMO that willingness to destroy what we already have should be unacceptable to reasonable conservatives.

Why? A huge amount of what we already have fucking sucks. Why should it be unacceptable to get rid of it?

Only because you morons are absolutely dedicated to proving that a kill switch is not a kill switch because it would make your policy look bad