They are cooling surfaces, to dissipate all that heat from them being, you know, on fire.

Clever.

Shit’s on fire, yo.

Prescient af.

Your evidence is utterly compelling.

The single paper that is linked as their research in this article itself states that the anomalies they are investigating have a reasonable likelihood of being contamination to the images. A comment on that paper points out other artifacts on the images that point to almost certainly being contamination.

They are also a further refutation of the common, yet unfortunate, critique that all transients are merely photographic or optical defects. That critique continues to circulate, despite being ruled out by our findings.

Their own papers, literally the one they link to in this article, state that this is a possible explanation.

Looking at a couple of the other papers they’ve published (I had to go to their main site to track them down) they also state that their findings can be explained by known phenomena of various types.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And this ain’t it.

Post whatever you want, let the voters decide :]

Yeah its really evocative.

Thanks for the comment, the sub is too quiet :]

This is good.

You literally engaged by commenting.

lot of people voting and commenting that didn’t read the article.

You didn’t read the article.

Of course they can. But Stranger Things most definitely is not.

Yeah posting shit like this on obscure corners of the internet is really going to smash the system. Kudos.

This is an extremely normal and common opinion.

Why are you trying to find consistency in the worldbuilding for this, it’s nonsense. Like, by all means enjoy it for whatever reasons, but logical and consistent lore and narrative is not one of those reasons.

This ain’t gonna block facial recognition for shit, duh.

I’m pretty sure that won’t foil any sort of serious facial recognition.

It’s not a different “description”, it’s a fundamentally different set of rules governing how the facts are arrived at.

I mean, this is just factually wrong. Different types of authority are, very obviously, meaningfully different in more than just “backstory”.