Kenzie Reeves

Doesn’t look AI generated, but does look Photoshopped. The pattern continues across the body in a way that looks like it’s been overlaid in post rather than painted on.

I had no idea they were so expensive! This is rather eye-opening, and it definitely gives new perspective to some of the points I made. Thank you for the insight.

I can see how you might reach that conclusion, but consider this: do you feel it is correct to bring a life into the world knowing that you can’t afford to provide for them? To me, that’s placing an unnecessary burden on both your family and society.

Though with that being said, someone else mentioned that reversals are ~$10,000, which is obscenely expensive and way more than I thought it would be, so the current cost of them does make it seem like I’m saying “only the rich should have children”, even when I’m not.

You’d be better off using an upscaling AI to do this rather than an AI that tries to reinterpret what’s already there. Go grab a pirated copy of Topaz Video Enhance and you’ll see what I mean.

Doesn’t work on mobile :(

This is the first time I’ve ever seen positive sentiment for Google+ online.

I come from early YouTube where it was forced upon us from above, so I’m genuinely curious as to what positives you see in it.

An evening with my what? /s

It can’t be that it’s defederated because I was using an account local to that instance. Plus, loading the community on a browser works fine.

This, plus the ability to open the main post and scroll sideways to view images in the post (as if they were galleries). That would be fantastic!

I went full Firefox a few weeks ago. It’s been mostly fine but there are a few weird hitches that Chromium-based browsers just don’t have. So because of that I currently think Brave is a good recommendation for most people.

Here’s a sneak peek of the progress for the next version of the LoRA:

I think the colours are better and everything is just a bit more consistent, but there is still more work to be done.

I want to! Even if it’s just a little, I think adding context makes things like this so much better. Plus it gives you the opportunity to continue that story later if people like it!

Yes! I asked her before I started. I may be a degenerate, but I’m not that bad.

Adding the word “scientific” to your point doesn’t make it more believable.

In fact, it detracts from your point by making you sound like you don’t know how to use the word.

The source is Lover In Law.

Original artist appears to be shengtian.

Something I like that’s unconventional yet not really taboo is pregnancy.

I like the idea of having had sex with a pretty girl and then doing it again when she’s carrying my child. I’m not sure exactly why, but I suppose it’s something built into people naturally? The pregnant physique is just very appealing to me, yet a similar physique from overeating is something I don’t like at all. It’s very strange.

How would you know when to turn to that page though?

If it tells you at the start to turn to that page and you do, does it tell you the story from 80-90% of the way through? Or is it a totally new short story since you haven’t started yet?

Or just… Use your eyes to tell roughly how old they are. No point fussing over details when it’s not even a real person.