It is cruel if you keep it while other people dont have anywhere to live.

The bread was just an example. This can be anything. I mean communism doesnt mean that people can enter your house without your consent. If they need land to live, the society will give them one even if it means giving up some of your own land so no one will be left without somewhere to live but as i said, it will still become their property. So, there is nothing wrong about property ownership as long as you divide them equally.

Last elections: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election

Christian sects distribution by state: https://mcimaps.com/reformation-day-christianity-in-america/

Which sect and religion voted for which one: https://prri.org/spotlight/religion-and-the-2024-presidential-election/

So you want any other proof sir?

Almost all of them I mean why do you think they supported Ronald Reagan so much and now Trump too. Here is your proof. Just look up who they voted for lol that will be your proof.

Calvin says “It is enough to be successful at your job in for the lord to love you” and “The only job of business owners and traders should be increasing their wealth because even the god gave the duty of ruling over others to them”. Zubritski, Kerov, Mitropelski, The Primitive Community, the Slave Society, the Feudal Society, p.257 I read the book in a different laguage so made the translation by myself but of course you can find it in english too. So dear friend, it is perfectly ethical for calvinists to work their asses off without asking for much in return since business owners have to be as greedy as possible meaning that they should give as little as possible to their workers and in return, the only thing god wants from workers is to be good at their job and it is enough. Furthermore, Calvinists also believe that god chose an elected few and gave them the wealth and they will also go to heaven while all others will go to hell no matter what and thats why they are poor. By that logic, it is perfectly ethical for protestants if we ensave them and make them work for us for almost nothing in return and abuse them as much as we want too. We can eat an entire table of food while watching them suffer and beg us to give them some food even a single piece of bread and not even give that one since they also respect property rights at its fullest and they wil still find this ethical. I hope this explains.

You are saying that but those protestant wil enslave us without a second thought. In fact we are already their slaves. They werre the slave owners before too. Arent all business owners trump reagan etc all protestants? What Im trying to say is that in this system which they are protecting one side will always enslave the other one so why shouldnt it be them? They would enslave black people today if they had the chanace as well i mean wasnt it protestants who established kkk and defended slavery? They will be okay with being slaves too. Why do you think there are more protests in France than there is in the UK or US? Everyone will be ruled in the way which they deserve and thats what they want too in fact they think god wants them to be that way so lets give them what they want. We will be happy in this world through using products which they will produce and they will be happy in the afterlife, everyone will be happy so why not?

No, it is moral if they consent and they will consent because thats their belief. We will not put them in chains, they will do this voluntarily. We just have to forcibly take away their wealth and then they will be okay with it since they will become the losing side since thats what they believe and they will also believe that they deserved to be in that situation. In conclusion, they will be voluntary slaves and leave slavery if they leave protestantism. We have a lot of poor and homeless people suffering because of their beliefs and the system they have built so why is it not fair if we do the same?

thank you so much

I mean if mods ban people for not agreeing with them basically.

I know what freedom of speech really means im a political science masters degree student at the moment. I didnt mean the constitution when i said “freedom of speech”. Im just asking if mods ban people basically for not agreeing with their opinions.

Yeah I looked it up and its true thanks but I dont know if it was Italians or Americans living in Venice who prepared the poster. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jun/24/inside-the-no-space-for-bezos-movement-one-man-rents-a-city-for-three-days-thats-obscene But still, I would be way harsher if I was the one preparing the poster. Im more the revolutionary kind and believe rich people should not be tolerated in any way when it comes to economy.

Please elaborate

From the Ohrid Lake to the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean, Macedonia will be free.

I told keeping wages in line with productivity do describe how it was before Reagan in the US. I didnt say its leftism.

Okay but by taking those allies into your movement, you end up pushing away a lot more people that would normally support you.

My family is extremely rich. My father is a contractor. So, I know how these companies think. I also studied management. The management will always talk about how they should care about environmental issues, gender issues, political correctness and always talk about how this will improve our reputation. This is also the same thing thought in university to me. However, you will never hear from none of them anything about economic inequalities. Never. I wrote this because I know how companies work and how naive the people are. For example, we arrange salesmen according to the traits of our customers. If the customer is a female, we arrange a handsome salesman. If she has colored hair or fat, we arrange a fat woman etc etc. You will not believe how naive people are.

Also forgot to mention that those who try breaking conflicts in other categories such as race, gender etc usually lose their focus on economic inequality. They will literally buy products from companies which support their views. My family is extremely rich and I dont buy anything except a few clothes that will be enough for a year once a year, eat salads and cook them myself. I dont order food from restaurants. Why? Because as i said, there are no companies that apply with my views since as i said, the only thing those companies will not go against is income inequality not even my own family company. I hope this will make it clear how most leftists lost their focus on economy.

Yeah I realized i can only post links there didnt know that so i deleted it. Im new here.

For your reply, as i said, I still think that money is the most important thing and a lot more important than taking the risk of dividing the left. I think every other category that has inequality among its members can be ignored if it is going to prevent breaking the economic inequality. So i think the left should accept anyone who wants to bring economic equality regardless of how discriminating or racist or any other thing they are. There is a reason why the only issue that corps dont want to be heard is economy. I dont get mad btw opinion is an opinion.

I fatwa $50 billion on Putin if the killer sırvives. If he does then I will kill him myself to not pay the price.

Dildoes and pocket pussies