• 0 Posts
  • 118 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 21st, 2025

help-circle
  • Oh I didn’t know that, thanks for the info. Yeah they wrapped up the story I just didn’t like the lack of closure, so I assumed it was a rush job. All I did was look up Travelers and saw it was canceled at some point. I understand what they were trying to do but it just didn’t sit right with me at all.

    Tap for spoiler

    For example, Marcy and David ending up back with each other at the end. It was a cute sentiment on surface level but that’s not the Marcy we knew, nor the Marcy he fell in love with. I’d rather he just continue as the amazing social worker he is, and them show the impacted lives he made up to that point.

    Mac totally changes the course of Kat’s life by making sure she never ended up with him. Hell, she probably ended up in an emotionally neglectful relationship, one she was obviously looking for a way out of when she met him. I guess it’s better than being manipulated by a traveler the rest of her life, but it was just an unfulfilling way to leave her.

    And the rest of the cast get nothing at all. I truly do get the message, fucking with time did not help anyone and allowing the timeline to unfold naturally is a better solution than the intervention of the travelers. Its supposed to be a bit somber and sad, with a cool little twist that the director starts loading it’s contingency plan.

    And Mac being able to travel before the most recent traveler felt like a huge Deus Ex Machina. This is one of the biggest things that separated Travelers apart from other time travel series, by limiting their capabilities to time travel. But suddenly we find out it has been possible the entire time? Rubbed me the wrong way and made it feel very similar to the ending of other time travel shows I’ve seen.

    Of course, this is personal opinion, and I hope not to offend you in any way if you enjoyed the ending. But for me personally, they missed the mark on what could have been an emotionally wrenching finale.



  • Buffy@libretechni.catomemes@lemmy.worldJust being a battery
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah but that falls firmly into the second camp of my argument. Maybe I didn’t make it super clear but I don’t think spoilers for the Matrix are a thing we should be complaining about, same for things like Star Wars and that applies doubly so to classic literature like Romeo and Juliet.

    But it’s not logical to discredit somebody’s feelings for something like, and just throwing a random movie out there, Eight Below. It’s not a household title and there’s a copious amount of media out there to sift through, enough for you to be able to dedicate your life to movie watching and still not even scratch the surface.

    And some people really care about their spoilers. It doesn’t really bother me, but I’ll defend those that it does; Especially when the typical argument discrediting their emotions is one grounded by emotion and not fact.


  • Buffy@libretechni.catomemes@lemmy.worldJust being a battery
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The age of something has no correlation to whether or not spoiling it for someone is valid. There’s youth being born today that obviously don’t have enough lived experience to watch every popular movie known to man. Even for an older audience, you’d have to dedicate all of your spare time watching movies just to keep up with the bare minimum of pop culture references.

    I’d argue instead that the Matrix is so widely known and referred to that it’s akin to Star Wars; Someone, somewhere is going to ruin it for you eventually and we can’t stifle our own cultural spread by limiting what we make reference to.