I think everyone can agree on this article
Companies that buy single-family homes say their businesses provide renters the opportunity to live in desirable neighborhoods where they otherwise couldn’t afford to buy.
That’s true, because companies buying SFHs make it unaffordable to buy homes in desirable neighborhoods. They are the solution to the problem they created.
That would be true if this situation didn’t exist before the leap in prices.
deleted by creator
Abbot has the ability to call the legislation into session whenever he wants to make them address special needs, he doesn’t need to wait for the next once-every-two-years session. Instead he tweets about it.
Nothing will get done to address this until someone greases his palm about it, and given the signaling here, he’s angling for that grease to come from the corps that own all the houses.
Absolutely, this has to be addressed. Owner-occupied makes the best neighborhoods and cities, in addition to righting the market.
deleted by creator
I guess my question to the OP and any other conservatives here (which I am not, to be up front) is: why is this something you want to solve? I don’t see how regulating this would be in line with conservative principles at all. Wouldn’t the conservative approach to be trusting the free market to eventually right any wrongs brought about?
deleted by creator
I would say that it aligns with a broad view of conservatives but not so much the conservative tradition in America, which has historically been fairly libertarian in their approach to the market. Regardless your reply makes sense, so I appreciate it. Sounds like one of those rare items of alignment between our political factions!
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Now you hold onto your biscuits, mister. Are you suggesting that basic human necessities, things that some might consider human rights, shouldn’t be turned into commodities?
Surely when people are mega rich, they’ll buy stuff and the gains will trickle down! /s
Instead they literally seek rent.
deleted by creator
I wouldn’t even bail out for COVID. I’m paying out the ass for insurance and still end up thousands in medical debt.
A gray area exists for small businesses, but fuck corporate welfare.
deleted by creator
@wintermute_oregon @Mango #COVID19 wasn’t an emergency.
deleted by creator
@wintermute_oregon ehhhhhhhh a 1% death rate doesn’t equal an emergency in my book. I get that people were scared, but still, cooler heads should prevail when it comes to government leadership
It’s easy to decide these things from the other side of history. At the time, when very little was known about survivability, transmissivity, etc, it was absolutely an emergency.
@nxdefiant I understand to some degree, but at the same time, wasn’t the death rate always no higher than 6% or so?
deleted by creator
deleted by creator



