Move comes in response to Canadian legislation requiring internet giants to pay news publishers

  • Tibert@compuverse.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 years ago

    Didn’t meta (Facebook) also threatened to remove news from Australia when a similar law passed? And they did nothing.

    • BlinkAndItsGone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Because they struck a deal with the media companies in that case. That hasn’t happened with Canada. They’re gonna do it this time, and I’m sure Canada will be fine without getting its news through Facebook.

  • NabeGewell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    This is good news, I think fb will lose more than the Canadian news publishers by doing this

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      I can believe it. My feed barely contains anyone I know or follow. Last time I checked, 31/36 things in my feed were things I never asked to see. Facebook is like watching network TV except it’s only commercials and every fifteen minutes they take a break and let you know how a friend is doing.

      I don’t go there very often.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      It can’t be a flawed argument if it reflects reality. So if we accept Meta’s information to be accurate, then they’re just stating a fact. FB users don’t care about news articles, so attempts to wring money out of a third party isn’t going to work, as we can see here.

      I’ve always been dubious of the “you should pay us to send us traffic” stance that news organizations seem to take every 5 or so years. It never works out.

  • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Boycott greedy, unethical Zuckerberg #DeleteFacebook #BoycottBillionaires