- cross-posted to:
- noncredibledefense@piefed.social
- cross-posted to:
- noncredibledefense@piefed.social
cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/noncredibledefense/p/1490862/the-correct-response
cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/noncredibledefense/p/1490862/the-correct-response
They do have mineral reserves and if the US threw their weight into supporting Ukraine, their businesses would be very willing to work with the US. Even from a self benefiting, pragmatic perspective, the US should be supporting them.
That’s why I’m so confused about the lukewarm support. From a purely capitalist lens, Ukraine could have been exploited to hell and back once Russia was BTFOd. But now they’re looking at a decades long demining operation which is gonna hurt the
exploitation effortbottom linebillionaires pocketsuhhhhh something.Well our capitalists are really really bad at capitalism, and are much more proficient at cronieism…cronism?..cronyism? Oh ok it’s the last one
We were pretty much onboard with helping Ukraine, and were providing intelligence and selling them arms.
But Trump is totally a Russian asset, or was at the time. (Russia spent a lot of resources and manpower on Trump’s 2016 campaign.) Nowadays, Trump might be catching on that Putin has absolutely no respect for him.