• jtrek
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Neat.

    Also when you scroll down on the page, the background gets more red. Is that a subtle “we’re turning more communist” joke? (Ok, it says linear-gradient(180deg,#e2f3ff,#ffecd9), which isn’t really red)

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    As someone that used to buy produce wholesale at the same warehouse that several local supermarkets did, you have no idea how much produce is marked up for retail. None at all.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      A lot of produce goes bad as well. They regularly throw out a lot of it (unfortunately much of it into bins, but I guess there’s a food safety issue with giving it to homeless people).

      Grocery stores in my country are operating on a 2-5% profit margin. All companies’ annual reports are public and shareholders can’t take dividends unless there’s profit AND there’s no tax on profit, only on dividends, so there’s little incentive to hide profits. And no, grocery prices aren’t cheap here either, they’re up a lot in the last 6 years and change.

      If Mamdani could cut costs 30%, either the stores aren’t turning a profit (which they don’t need to since they’re being run for the benefit of New Yorkers), or Americans have it much worse in terms of price gouging. I suspect it might be the latter if there aren’t as many competing chains in the US. Here we’ve got 3-4 even in many small towns, 6-7 in the cities, and of course small independent ones in some places. And one of them is a co-op. But I’d still expect NYC in particular to have healthy competition, it’s such a huge market and so dense, room for a lot of competing stores.

      Where the markup is criminal IMO is nonperishable goods. Fucking regular pens with a 300% markup in office supply stores, etc. Stuff they don’t have to throw out after a few days.

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      I suppose there’s a big markup to account for what they’ll end up throwing out, and then the high price is part of why there’s so much unsold and needing to be disposed of.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          a lot of that ugly produce is what goes into canning and pre-made products.

          This is just supposition on my part based on personal experience, but it seems ever since the tariff bullshit started, the availability of quality produce has crashed for me in america, and not only are the “ugly” ones ending up on shelves now, but even damaged ones. . as if theres not enough produce coming in to to allow stores to be selective on what appears on shelves vs what goes into canning/etc.

          I’ve noticed potatos are smaller, often heavily blemished, meaning I might get 2/3rds of a the weight of edible potato with 1/3rd going to scrap because of damage/etc.

          Tomatos too, tend to be smaller, often bruised, and i’ve found rot inside more tomtatos since tariff bullshit started, than in all the decades before.

          Carrots are thin, spindly, and barely have any crunch to them.

          Lettuce is now giving everyone Trumparrhea

          Onions, even worse than potatos, are blemished or mouldy, and I might be lucky to get half a pound of edible onion for every pound I buy.

          and its same with everything else I’ve not mentioned in the produce section.

          I imagine some of this may be regional as well, so that people on the opposite side of the country from me might not have the same experience.

        • osanna@lemmy.vg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I often go for the “ugly” produce, because i know others won’t. if it saves a bit of waste, then why not. Not like it tastes any differently.

    • osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      damn commies. Don’t they know that the big grocery stores need to make ANOTHER billion dollar profit? I mean, if the CEOs don’t buy those billion dollar yachts, who will? THINK OF THE YACHT COMPANIES!

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The funniest headlines from NYP and Fox are simultaneously promoting socialist democrats and criticizing the DNC centrist they are aiming to replace lol.

  • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Look at this guy. Finally, people who are able to bring together a broad front of the left, in order to actually fight. Who thunk it’d be an unapologetic “hardcore” socialist party that includes Marxist-Leninists, anarchists, social democrats, pro-electoral socialists, union socialists and even progressive liberals.

    The fascists were able to effectively organize and seize power because they were able to bring together a front that included moderates, independents, white supremacists, randians, neo-Nazis and bible thumpers, all who disagreed on some level but found common ground on hatred, classism and selfish greed.

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The fascists didn’t have popular support, though. They only won because it was a coup. The US is not a democracy.

      Fix the election system, and we’ll get leftists in the White House.

      • hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        True. And the DSA platform includes doing away with the senate. I’d also do away with the executive and have a prime minister appointed instead by congress. One person should not have their own cabinet with complete control of the administration of bureaucratic agencies. We could all benefit from a parliamentary system, especially with representation for DC, US territories, representatives from the collective of tribal nations and Puerto Rico.

        Maybe we have a shot at catching up with the rest of the world, instead of remaining in the political Stone Age.

      • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The fascists didn’t have popular support, though. They only won because it was a coup. The US is not a democracy.

        Can you please clarify what you mean? While I agree with your conclusion, I don’t follow your two statements leading up to it, especially the coup part. Are you talking about the last presidential election or something else?

        • brownsugga@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          There are multiple lawsuits alleging fraud in the 2024 election, on the part of Trump, Elon and various republican factions

          • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Thanks. I’ll have to read up on those allegations. The official counts appear to show that Trump received over 2 million more votes than Harris, so it seems to me any fraud to make this happen would have needed to be massive. We do have the electoral college system so I guess it’s possible that smaller efforts could have flipped the result, but we barely hear anything about any of this in the media. Given that, my first instinct to the idea that Trump’s win in 2024 was a coup is to think that it’s a liberal version of MAGA’s 2020 election fraud claims.

            • brownsugga@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              https://ballotpedia.org/Election_lawsuits_and_litigation,_2024

              There were (are) a bunch of lawsuits about it. The DOJ being firmly in the hands of the Trump administration is actually one of the reasons many of these cases aren’t seeing light, not to mention all major media outlets are now owned by Trump supporters.

              One I remember in particular were several counties in NY state where votes for a Dem senator were recorded, but NO votes for president were recorded. Many thousands of times.

              The coup is in progress; and we won’t know if it succeeds or not until November I guess

              • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Thanks for the link. I have no doubt that lawsuits fly with every election, especially national/presidential ones, but the main question for me would be how many more legitimate lawsuits were filed in response to 2024 compared to 2020, 2016, 2012? I have a hard time believing that there was widespread fraud and a coup this last election if nearly no one talks about it, not just in major media outlets but also non-major media, alternative media, social media. I can count on my fingers the number of times I’ve seen this mentioned.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Well, Trump did say that his buddy Elon is very good with computers, including voting machines, and would ensure a victory… That alone should trigger an alarm bell

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why do his backup singers look so grumpy?

    This isn’t supposed to be snarky, by the way. I love what Mamdani’s doing, this is just about the photography and the editorial choice to use that photo instead of one three seconds later where they might be smiling

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    This guy has some style. Who would have thought serving the publics needs would play so well?

    DNC, do you see any of this?

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can’t WAIT to VOTE him OUT so I can pay MORE for Groceries again!

    -LITERALLY Republican Voters!

    • holy_scroller@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not a Republican, but there is a lot of nuance.

      He can sell groceries at a loss because the money comes from other places…all of which is eventually paid for in taxes (in this case there is probably a small resitribution from rich to poor which I am happy with).

      I don’t mind Democrats getting caught helping their constituents. But let’s not pretend he found some cheap grocery loophole; grocery store are already incredibly efficient, they only make ~3% profit. I am just speculating that the logistics needed to spin up govt groceries is much larger than the existing ~3% markup from the private sector.

      • potpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ag/food production is already subsidized, so it’s not like buying from for profit stores eliminates social aspects of the industry. On the other side, what NYC is doing is removing CEOs with multimullion dollar comp packages from the equation.

        • holy_scroller@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          The problem is we are only talking about grocery stores where the revenue is only about 3%. Ton of problems with Big Ag which as you said is heavily subsidized. I don’t mind the redistribution. I think it is great optics. But I just think it is ineffective, because grocery stores (only talking stores) are in fact very efficient already.

      • bowsertattoo@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        grocery stores are efficient for their owners, but not for food. grocery stores waste a lot of food. source: i used to eat grocery store dumpster food

        • holy_scroller@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          If they were efficient for their owners, there profit would be a shit ton more than 3% of revenue.

          Food dumping is its own issue. I bet the government grocery stores will have to follow the exact same laws.

          The Piggly Wigley or the Bodega are not raking it in.

          • quarkquasar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            It’s true, the people who own the stores make barely anything.

            We all know capitalists just help people out of the goodness of their hearts. That’s why America has free health care and no gun worries.

            • holy_scroller@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I would suggest you look up exactly what they make. Plenty of grocery stores are publicly traded companies. Go ask a bodega owner.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The only thing that can stop a primary candidate with a platform like Mamdani, is depressed Dem primary turnout…

    The DNC chair didn’t endorse him in the primary, because this chair will never even glance at the scales during any primary.

    But literal days after Mamdani became the candidate, he gave a PBS interview talking about how if Dems want to win, we need to run candidates like Mamdani.

    We’ll get a fair primary with nothing holding us back, and voting in the Dem primary comes with zero obligations in the general. There is absolutely zero reason to stop voting in Dem primaries now. It’s more important than it’s ever been, because it’ll be the first fair one in at least 30 years.

    But all the stuff Mamdani is doing in NYC today, can be done nationwide in just a couple years if we don’t give up right before the finish line of a marathon

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      By the same token, now is the time to promote this message of hope and action wherever you see it, and proactively address expressions of doom and defeat, however harmless they may seem. We all share responsibility for this to the extent that, taken together, these attitudes constitute a climate of action or inaction.

      Now is not the time to give up and stay home, yet there are many currently in a state of deep hopelessness they feel compelled to spread. These comrades are effectively deactivated right now, and would deactivate others if only as a comfort to themselves, to validate their fear and justify their inaction. They don’t realize, or simply aren’t considering, how contagious and harmful it can be.

      Edit: If you ever wondered what JFK meant by “fear itself,” wonder no further. We’re all living in such times.

    • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Which upcoming dem primary are you referring to when you say “it’ll be the first fair one in at least 30 years”?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The only one the DNC is supposed to be involved in…

        And in case you don’t know what that is because since slick Willy was in office (30 years ago) the neoliberals have kept their finger on the scal s and in all the pies:

        The presidential primary

        • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Got it, thanks. What leads you to believe that the neoliberals will not have their finger on the scales in the next presidential primary?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            That the current DNC chair was the state party chair of Minnesota for a decade with a proven track record of doing so…

            That the way the neoliberals controlled politicians and entire state parties was withholding funding thru the victory fund and the current chair has immediately and without strings dumped that money back on the state parties…

            That the current DNC chair said Mamdani is the type of candidate we need for president both in policy and charisma…

            And a bunch of other reasons.

            • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Thanks. I guess I hadn’t been keeping an eye on the DNC over the last couple of years. I hope that this will pan out!

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                It already is…

                The reason why we keep winning special election is with the funding from the DNC, everywhere has been operating at campaign levels for a year and a half.

                Normally that’s only for 2 maybe 3 months before the general.

                Trump controls the RNC, and if they give anyone money it’ll only be the most extreme maga candidates who are likely to lose.

                The cards are dealt, we just haven’t laid them down yet.

                • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Interesting, thanks. Does that mean that progressive candidates actually have a chance of getting DNC money or at least fair treatment this time around?

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Concerns with this model.

    • Scalping. What is preventing people from buying out the store in bulk and reselling outside the store for a profit.
    • 30% of what? If private grocery stores drop their prices/profits to be competitive, will these municipal stores drop their prices again? I would think a set profit rate for a municipal store would cut out price gouging, but allow private grocery stores to continue operations.
    • What are actual profit margins that grocery stores in the city are running on? Many articles say 1-3% profits are typical for grocery stores. Is this true for NYC?
    • Is this expected to a budget expense or a self funded operation after the initial investment?

    EDIT: To be clear I want this to succeed. Questioning the government’s implementation should be encouraged

    • Duckingold@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      The details aren’t all there yet, but potential options:

      • scalping - put an upper limit order value or max number of an item in place. You can’t completely remove scalping, but if they can maintain stock, there isn’t a real need to go to a scalper.
      • 30% of what is the current grocery price. If other stores drop their price then I would expect the price differential will drop but the objective will be met then.
      • Odds are the municipal store won’t compete on every item, but more the essentials. I’d expect it to look more like an Aldi than a store with 60 options. Lower prices should cause higher turnover of perishable items and lower variety would minimize hitting expiration dates. Shrink is where a lot of profit is lost in grocery stores, so it’s a good thing to target. Municipal store should also be able to use some government beuracracy (food stamps, food banks) already in place to have lower overhead.
      • it should be able to be self funded but realize it will likely start linking together food security programs (food stamps, wic) which would look like it is getting extra gov funding even though the tax burden wouldn’t change.
    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Scalping. What is preventing people from buying out the store in bulk and reselling outside the store for a profit.

      Others can just go to the store.

      30% of what?

      One assumes these stores are not trying to generate profit. Logic implies that the prices are being compared to other stores.

      Your other questions don’t interest me enough to look further, but I’m sure someone will.

      • apftwb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Others can just go to the store

        Other people going to the store doesn’t stop scalpers from clearing the shelves. If they restock overnight, scalpers can and do wait for stores to open just so they can clear them out.

        Logic implies that the prices are being compared to other stores.

        Imagine this scenario. Private grocery store (PGS) sells bread for $5 a loaf. Municipal grocery store (MGS) sells bread for $3.50. PGS decides to cut their profits margins (citation needed) and sell at a competitive $3.50. MSG sells bread at $2.75 (after all this is 70% of 3.50). This repeats until the PGS goes out of business and the operating cost of MSG is much higher than expected.

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Stores are often easily able to put a limit per transaction. I don’t think a scalper is going to go through the till 500 times to clear the store of its 1000 jugs of milk limited to 2 per person.

    • yonderbarn@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      During the press conference a journalist asked the question on scalping and the EDC director said that they would have mechanisms in place to prevent it.

  • KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Even the Egyptian kings knew if they kept the populace fed, sheltered, and somewhat entertained that the public would do what they were told. Now with so many homeless and so many joining the ranks quickly they’re voice is being shut out by the same people who are causing famine, disease, and chaos in order to profit from it.

    Mr. Mamdani is a student of history and realizes this, not so much because he wants to control the populace but because he’s a good person. He has a moral compass that points to “good” - for the good of all.

    • raze2012@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s literally bread and circuses. Meanwhile capitalism has decided to take away bread and jack up the price of circuses and they are surprised the people are turning on it. Thoughts and prayers don’t fill stomachs: actions do.

  • cheers_queers@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    and the tankies are soooooooo butthurt. calling him a libtard and stuff. at least he is doing SOMETHING USEFUL.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t know of anybody who could be accurately described as “tankie” who would be against anything he’s done. They might say it doesn’t go far enough, but I wouldn’t describe that as “butthurt”. Where are you encountering comments like that?

      • Instigate@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not the same commenter as the one you’ve replied to, but I’ve definitely seen tankies shitting on people who support Mamdani. I didn’t save any of those comments so I can’t directly point to any right now, but many of your comrades over on .ml are continuing to sow dissent on the left; pushing anti-voting rhetoric; and suggesting that even Mamdani doesn’t pass the purity test. It’s unhelpful at best and actively helping Republicans at worst.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Honestly, I would not be surprised if something like 80% of those that identify as tankies online are just paid actors working to try to depress Democratic turnout.

        • Rekhyt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          My favorite are the ones who have been like “He hasn’t said a single word about Palestine since the election!” that I was seeing a few months ago. Even more hilarious with his recent very public statements.

          • 3abas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            What’s hilarious about his recent public statements?

            He literally ran on the idea that he would arrest netanyahu, and his recent statement was “he’s a war criminal, but whoopsie I actually can’t arrest him, sorry”

            That his very political backtracking is hilarious to you is very concerning. He’s not a horrible mayor, Americans would be way better off with people like him in power, but of course socialist will shit on him as he maintains the imperial status quo. He’ll talk about Palestine and keep using it as rhetoric, but so far all he’s done is call netanyahu a war criminal and say he can’t arrest him, and he is working very closely with several Zionists on his team.

            The problem with liberals is they worship individuals instead of ideals and ideas. You can’t criticize mamdani without being called a maga or tankie, there is no room for discussion, he’s perfect and can do no wrong because “his moral compass points to good”.

        • underisk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          My “comrades” are like people who signed up to the same email server, were not all familiar with each other. There’s not some meeting or private chat I can bring the matter to.

          Is there anybody of significance, or significant number of people, saying these things? Or are we letting the trolls dictate the worst takes for everyone?

          • Instigate@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            https://aussie.zone/post/34009816/23629202

            https://aussie.zone/post/34788654/24037514

            https://aussie.zone/post/34745780/24008930

            https://aussie.zone/post/34745780/24008953

            Just a handful of examples I found lazily searching for a couple of minutes - and that’s only specific to criticising Mamdani. If you want a list of .ml users encouraging people in the US to stop voting altogether, that list would be much longer.

            My “comrades” are like people who signed up to the same email server, were not all familiar with each other.

            Of course you don’t personally know everyone from .ml but you’ve been here long enough to know exactly the kind of person that maintains and posts from an account on .ml. Tankies spouting No True Scotsman, anti-voting, leftist-dividing, Russia/PRC dick-sucking rhetoric are par for the course. It’s why as soon as someone comments from a .ml domain the rest of us collecvitely sigh and brace ourselves before we read what you have to say.

            I’m not denying that there are reasonable and rational people from .ml - you yourself seem to be one of them - but there is so much bad faith whataboutism and tankie nonsense that people like yourself who continue to maintain a .ml account end up getting lumped in with them.

            • Enkrod@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I have been blocking .ml for a couple of days now after having been argued with in bad faith, having words put into my mouth and basically having been declared one of “Hitlers Helpers” for just talking about my lived experience with the GDR and being a social democrat instead of a communist.

              Lemmy in its entirety has become so much more pleasant and the amount of posts and comments that go “voting makes no sense at all” that I see has plummeted to basically nothing. It’s very refreshing.

              • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                When I originally joined Lemmy I joined .ml because it seemed like the default instance. It’s hosted by the devs! It seemed like a good choice. But as this platform has grown and especially during the lead up to the 2024 election the awful side of that instance really started to show and I decided to leave. I’m glad I did. It sucks that the dev-hosted instance is such a cesspit as that is where I would expect new users to end up.

        • PotatoPie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You need to understand the difference between shitting on people and calling out hypocrisy

          Let’s follow this train of thought that ended with people believing that rare instances of successful compromised socialism through voting is more socialist than marxism

          When a Israel parade takes place in NY people will call it out and demand support for genocidal ethno state cease completely, of course the mayor wants to do that but the power you gain from being voted in is limited, limited by the people allowing you to stay in office, take a look at khan in ICC, this isn’t very good because it makes democracy look like a failed system, it isn’t we just like to consider the powerful as morally just people that will adhere to it, thinking otherwise is too scary to consider, listen i don’t get paid enough to hate governments

          So naturally democrats wanting to get any sort of legitimacy for voting even though a pedophile was voted into office(the goal is to maintain stability at the sacrifice of change) will label this criticism or pointing out limits of power of the voted in representatives as an attack on change, the idea here is that any concession allowed by the ruling class must not be judged or criticized, turning the struggle against them into a struggle for them, they did permit us to have Mamdani so we should not question it further and just focus on throwing away the original principles that the movement stood for and instead have Mamdani become the movement to highlight how successful it is, he was the 1 in 100 good apple the system leaked through so there’s no way he’s suppressed or contained, did i say concession earlier, i meant victory

          Now that we’ve adapted to this new successful view(the 1 in 100 Mamdanism) that keeps giving legitimacy to democracy we can shit on anyone, especially people who used to criticize us, like tankies! But wait we were both against the epstein class, wars in middle east how come we’re against them now? Well they must have veered away from their principles of socialism, see socialism is all about democracy(alarm bells) trust me and tankies criticize our democratic representatives, we also agree with them on criticism for 99/100 of the representatives but listen, tankies are enemies, not just any enemies, a bigger enemy than misrepresentation even! If they judge any representative we don’t judge then they’re against the 1in100Mamdanism movement which is socialism(through elections but don’t bring that up now, we made progress here), if they do agree well that’s good but it doesn’t show greatness of elections and stability so why focus on it

          It’s better to point at tankies as the evildoers who tried to get in our way whenever the 1in100Mamdanism succeeds again, than to point to the Democrats and republicans that did a smear campaign against him, because we are a fair and functioning democracy, and pointing the latter puts a question mark on something that should never be questioned

    • PotatoPie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      They are? I feel like you’re butthurt about tankies advocating for marxism that any success the ideology has needs to be stripped away from it and announced as against it?

      I’ve never seen a single tankie hating on mumdani if anything they just keep hating on everyone who’s hating on mumdani, because mumdani actually pushes socialist policies

      I’m getting very confused what i’m supposed to be arguing against here, is your point that tankies aren’t socialist?

      …?