downhomechunk@midwest.social to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 years agothis meme goes from acute to obtuse real quickmidwest.socialimagemessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up1600arrow-down111
arrow-up1589arrow-down1imagethis meme goes from acute to obtuse real quickmidwest.socialdownhomechunk@midwest.social to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 years agomessage-square16linkfedilink
minus-squareTonyTonyChopper@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 years agowhat about the number whose square is -1
minus-squarenomecks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·3 years agoRoses are red, Euhler’s a hero, e^iπ+1=0
minus-squareaffiliate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·3 years agoas far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.) what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
minus-square⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zonedeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agoSomeone needs to hit you with a dose of reality
what about the number whose square is -1
Roses are red, Euhler’s a hero, e^iπ+1=0
You’re just imagining it
as far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.)
what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
Someone needs to hit you with a dose of reality