Why does ‘tripling renewables’ mean building at least 1,500 GW per year by 2030?

ember-climate.org

Why does ‘tripling renewables’ mean building at least 1,500 GW per year by 2030?

ember-climate.org

Hugohase@kbin.social to

Climate@slrpnk.net · 2 years ago

Ahead of COP28, we unpack what a global goal to triple renewables means for annual deployment rates.

You must log in or # to comment.

Chat

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

442 users / day
2.1K users / week
3.7K users / month
7.3K users / 6 months
36 local subscribers
8.45K subscribers
11.9K Posts
42.9K Comments
Modlog

mods:
silence7@slrpnk.net