schizoidman@lemmy.zip to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6か月前Wikipedia loses UK Safety Act challenge, worries it will have to verify user IDsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square70linkfedilinkarrow-up1421arrow-down11 cross-posted to: legalnews@lemmy.zipprivacy@programming.deveurope@feddit.org
arrow-up1420arrow-down1external-linkWikipedia loses UK Safety Act challenge, worries it will have to verify user IDsarstechnica.comschizoidman@lemmy.zip to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6か月前message-square70linkfedilink cross-posted to: legalnews@lemmy.zipprivacy@programming.deveurope@feddit.org
minus-squareInFerNo@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·6か月前Retaining truthful information with obstructed access is not the same as offering redacted or altered information to a specific region.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mlBannedlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·6か月前The UK is demanding that Wikipedia redacts information for users which refuse to identify themselves, and users under 18. It’s far worse than simply not showing certain articles.
Retaining truthful information with obstructed access is not the same as offering redacted or altered information to a specific region.
The UK is demanding that Wikipedia redacts information for users which refuse to identify themselves, and users under 18. It’s far worse than simply not showing certain articles.