• malwieder@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    7 months ago

    While I agree that Proton is awesome, running a game originally released for PS3/360 with enhanced visuals at 60 FPS (instead of 30ish) on a 1660 Ti is hardly anything to write home about.

    • muhyb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Heh, my main machine still has 1660 Ti. I wouldn’t say it’s low end. It’s better than 3050.

      • Demdaru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        …my is gtx 750. Just. Every year, it becomes more disheartening to be on internet xD

        • muhyb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Don’t be. :)

          If it works for you, it works. I use my GPUs until they die. Nothing wrong with being a patient gamer.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    To be honest I’d be surprised if it didn’t. I ran the OG version on a 2011 MacBook air with Intel HD 3000 integrated graphics. On HD 4000 it actually ran quite well.

  • harbard@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh it’s the best. I can run just about any game now between proton, wine and other Linux tools for gaming like lutris or play-on-Linux. Gaming on Linux has come a long way.

  • kugmo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    If your laptop has more than 2 cores/2 threads and has integrated graphics better than HD 6xx it is not low end.

  • neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I booted windows on a 2012 MacBook Pro with a 650m gpu and that computer got HOT!

    I know it’s been 13 years, but it doesn’t feel that long and now a phone can probably run that game no problem.

    Mind sharing your specs?

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    On a 1660 Ti (MaxQ, I presume)? I can believe it. It’s the exact range of game that card is made for. At a glance I don’t see Skyrim AE benchmarks, but notebookcheck has it running Monster Hunter World, MGS V and Rise of the Tomb Raider maxed out at 1080p60ish.

    Maybe I’m spoiled by just assuming Windows and Linux benchmarks are comparable by default? I guess it’s no longer a surprise now, so… congrats, everybody?

    Also, man, is there something you can do about those CPU temps? It makes me nervous just to look at that 28% utilization at 90C. I’ve been away from gaming laptops since handhelds are a thing and I’m not used to that anymore.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      at that 28% utilization at 90C

      It’s probably all single threaded. Overall CPU usage isn’t very useful in the day and age of 8-24 core CPUs. Especially hybrid architectures like Intel has.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sure, and with the GPU sucking up a bunch of juice that’s plenty to get toasty.

        It’s just I haven’t been using laptops that do that in the past few years and coming from desktop world it feels so wrong now.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was playing Nine Sols for quite a little while yesterday, and when I switched away for something I discovered that NixOS had decided to rebuild the kernel when I did an update and I hadn’t noticed. It was sitting there with the load at 18, all the cores pegged in the red, just happily playing the game for me as normal the whole time.

    Nine Sols is not some kind of graphical powerhouse but still I was pretty impressed.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not sure which one that is, but the first and second gen Ryzen APUs were fire. They were massively under appreciated at the time.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ryzen really shook things up when it came out. They were running on par, or nearly on par, with Intel’s current offering for like 2/3 the price.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          The laptop APUs were better than Intel, with lower power, and far better graphics!

          It got even more dramatic in the 4000 series. Renior is one of the best chips AMD ever made.

          TBH the press just had a hard time comprehending it back then, and it was lest dramatic on desktop (or tanky desktop-sized laptops with dGPUs) because Intel’s chips could clock higher for single-threaded workloads (at the expense of mad power usage).

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Im playing it on my steamdeck. Ugh just lost a thrall and could not find shadowmere for awhile after the soul cairn. I really wish the thrall spell would just set the thrall to the max level of the spell rather than fail due to auto leveling thing.