Drew@sopuli.xyzM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 7 months agoWhat could this formula be?sopuli.xyzimagemessage-square31linkfedilinkarrow-up1117arrow-down10
arrow-up1117arrow-down1imageWhat could this formula be?sopuli.xyzDrew@sopuli.xyzM to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works · 7 months agomessage-square31linkfedilink
minus-squareOccultist0178@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up54·7 months agoE = mc² + AI must be the obvious answer
minus-squareLittle8Lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·7 months agoWhat i think is funny is that AI has to equal 0 so its actually saying that AI is useless So people fond of AI are criticising it themselves XD
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·7 months agoYeah. Because screw laws of thermodynamics, am I right?
minus-squareLittle8Lost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·7 months agoAs long as AI = 0 it works
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·7 months agoUnfortunately, AI is currently negative, as in it makes things worse.
minus-squarefckreddit@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoTrue. One cannot expect statistical parrots to be intelligent, no matter how sophisticated they are.
E = mc² + AI must be the obvious answer
What i think is funny is that AI has to equal 0 so its actually saying that AI is useless
So people fond of AI are criticising it themselves XD
Yeah. Because screw laws of thermodynamics, am I right?
As long as AI = 0 it works
Unfortunately, AI is currently negative, as in it makes things worse.
I is 0, as it is nonexistent
True. One cannot expect statistical parrots to be intelligent, no matter how sophisticated they are.