• slaacaa@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m wondering which of these 2 options is true for the chief techbro who came up with this:

    1. They are genuinely clueless, and have never used ChatGPT for more than 5 minutes
    2. They know the limitations of LLMs well, but they want to ride the AI hype to inflate their company value (and maybe cut some costs by downsizing)
    • dwemthy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      1 year ago

      They believe in infinite growth. They think LLMs are going to get reliable fast. LLMs have probably played a direct role in convincing them of that

    • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep they’re paying lip service to the employees but this message is 100% to potential investors looking to bet on the AI wave.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        it being an email from their CEO is basically all the evidence needed, CEOs don’t say anything that isn’t somehow meant to increase profits.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For the first time ever, teaching as well as the best human tutors is within our reach.

    No it fucking isn’t. The video calls are awful and don’t do anything to help you learn why what you said is wrong. Lilly just acts confused and ignores what you said. And in their normal explanations it just assumes why you didn’t know something, gives an answer for what it guessed, and doesn’t do anything else. The old explanations were much better than the new garbage they offer.

    • Christian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Opened the comments because I got stuck at this line for a bit. When I got to this part my brain added in commas and it took me a little because even though “teaching, as well as the best human tutors, is within our reach” doesn’t really make sense, it still seems less nonsensical than without the commas.

  • tauren@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    AI could make Duolingo better because it doesn’t teach a language in its current state. It could explain to the user why their answer is wrong and offer exercises. But instead of doing that, they simply replace employees to save money? What a garbage company. It’s a shame their app is so popular. It gives people nothing but a false sense of learning.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It could explain to the user why their answer is wrong

      FWIW that feature has existed in the premium version for about a year or so

      • tauren@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I abandoned Duolingo 6 months ago. If that’s true, they failed to advertise that to me. In any case, with modern llms you don’t need Duolingo for that. You can ask them. You can copy-paste any article on a subject that interests you, and ask an llm to simplify it to your A1-A2 level. You can ask it to generate exercises, to explain things. Flashcards? Please, Anki is free.

        • npcknapsack@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          When I got rid of Duo, it had removed the crowd sourced explanations and only had the super-premium support in select countries, so even if I wanted to subscribe to it, as a non-American, I couldn’t.

          Mind you, I didn’t want the AI-based version because yeah. I could use Anki + ChatGPT for free.

  • Kekzkrieger@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ever since their content is being created or at least sub crrated by AI the quality has gone down noticeable, ive seen so many incorrect sentences which is shit when trying to learn a language. And if i, as a beginner learner can figure out wrong sentences what the actual fuck is ai doing?

  • PDFuego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t used the app for a while, but I still have it installed. The delete account button doesn’t work, and neither does the feedback button. Cool.

    • whats_all_this_then@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Try a VPN to any EU country. I find that platforms can get really cooperative really fast when you wanna delete your account and they think GDPR applies

      Unless you’re already in the EU in which case you could try “Mine” (saymine.com) although it’s been a minute and the AI stuff on their site does by fill me.with confidence

  • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly I was thinking of removing duo before this. It’s just glorified flash cards making you memorize words associations instead of getting into how thimgs work. I still haven’t gotten the rules of how verb conjugation works in Italian. Just gonna read the books I got.

  • piefood@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was using Khan Academy when they went to AI. Suddenly my answers were being marked as incorrect, even though they matched the “correct” answer presented. Or they were marked incorrect becuase I used pi, when it said I could answer in terms of pi.

    I’m expecting the same to happen here.

  • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Glad I finished my first Dutch unit just to get the basics and am deleting the app today. It feels like a real condemnation of the state of modern AI that I don’t trust a large language model with languages.

  • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    This email makes no sense.

    Let me paraphrase them:

    We bet on mobile and won big. AI is great. AI tutors are a thing.

    Therefore we’ll get AI to understand our codebase and get it to fo stuff people did before

    This isn’t “betting on” AI. This is outsourcing to AI.

    You can be an AI company (theoretically) - have people make AI models that are then deployed. Note the lack of recursively, made-by-AI-for-AI products and services.

    Tbh, Duolingo was always a gimmick. It doesn’t teach you a language. It teaches you small snippets of 5-10 words each with little to no grammar. It’s repetitive and boring. It was that way before the lives they said they’d never add.

    They lost me as a user when they rolled out lives.

    Now, I hope they lose someone else.

    Duolingo has potential. But learning a language always required a large time investmant, and it always will.

    I assume its lessons will only get worse than they already are.

  • Waldelfe@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t be good for the quality. I already get a lot of errors in my native language: the correct translation to my native language is not accepted and the “correct translation according to Duolingo” is grammatically wrong. So I keep getting errors for not using wrong grammar in my own mother language. This is going to keep getting so much worse and I have to wonder, if I’m even learning the correct grammar in the foreign language.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah, it’s pretty common for AI answers to feel very accurate and useful on topics the user doesn’t know much about, but highly error-prone and unreliable on topics the user is an expert in. … … …