

- cross-posted to:
- historymemes@lemmy.world




Removed by mod
There are a lot of modern languages that don’t have a pure “yes”/“no”. Likely, this was not uncommon in history either.
Alternatives to “yes”/“no” in those languages can vary. They generally include methods such as “not (that)” or negating the (sometimes (mis-) implied/interpreted/understood) verb of the question.
Removed by mod
That’s because most people couldn’t read or write, so they would shake their head yes or no.
I have no idea why, I’m just making shit up.
Latin is a very… funny language. Very contextual.
Very rich language in ways to describe violence, though!
Removed by mod
In classical latin, you disagreed by stabbing them, and you agreed by making them emperor.