- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
- technews@radiation.party
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmit.online
- technews@radiation.party
You must log in or # to comment.
Some things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.
SomeMOST things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.FTFY
SomeMOSTthings just shouldn’tbe connected to the internet.IFTTT
SomeMOSTthings just shouldn’t beconnectedtotheinternet.Checks out. All suffering is caused by being.
SomeMOSTthingsjustshouldn’tbeconnectedtotheinternet.
Apparently I’m one of those things. Jesus, what an article
Unfortunately connecting this kink to the internet facilitates doing it. Having the device itself connect for ease of use had caused an unbelievable amount of tech issues, though. To be fair the programmer is a dipshit, though.
But that just makes connecting those things to the internet forbidden… and therefore alluring.
and therefore alluring.
…provides the most complete remote sex solution for the Internet and corporate intranet.
Lol ha ha
A piece of internet history. So glad it’s been preserved.
deleted by creator
That thumbnail is A+
So is the headline. Chastity cage, exposed. 🤣
Imagine having your smart cock cage locked out by Amazon because some rando told them you are racist lmao
We live in the weirdest timeline
Better than having it locked on I suppose…
Example #4363 why making everything “smart” is a terrible fucking idea
Not inherently, they coulda followed best practices. But this is definitely a reason not to buy smart things.
Isn’t this just facilitating their humiliation kink? I think it’s more of a service.
That would be non-consensual.
Probably in the EULA
Removed by mod
The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users,
10,000 users‽
yup :3
Rule 34 extends to action as well as observance.
deleted by creator
Your cock is mine now
I’m dying
That probably worked for most of the clientele.
I’ll be honest, not the worst possible issue with a smart chastity cage that I could think of.
It is when I lock your shit remotely and then change the password
TFW chinese hackers hold your dick for ransom until you send them crypto
It’s happened:
LOL, junksomware.
At least someone other than me is holding my dick.
This exact scenario has appeared in an entirely unsurprising number of chastity stories.
And to think I don’t even feel safe about buying something as innocent as a smart TV…
Why oh why can one no longer buy a dumb TV?! Do companies just not make them anymore?!
The chastity belt may be smart, but the maker never claimed to be so.
I feel like like the potential for being exposed as a chastity cage user might actually be a plus for some users
If this is the same one I remember from a couple years back, what’s not listed in this article: two different security teams warned them of the vulnerabilities multiple times, the vendor claimed to have fixed the issue when they hadn’t, the devices didn’t have any sort of physical bypass in case of malfunction, and what finally convinced the pen testers to go public was the company announcing that they planned to make a locking inflatable butt plug using the same platform.
At some point the security vulnerabilities are a feature, not a bug. Butt plug ransomware is the latest sex toy fad.
God i hope the users used a email alias and fake names
???
