Had the same reaction to that part.

I love it!

Not sure how “idle” this is, but little alchemy 2 is a great pass time for me at the moment.

A FLOCK OF MOOSEN

It’s pretty average to me. (Positive leaning)

The low performance of the game relative to other large, good-looking games definitely makes me less eager to play it.

Also I’m irked at Todd for his comments about people needing to upgrade their PC for the game. JayzTwoCents even showed that his 4090 didn’t get great frames. (comparatively that is. Like he was getting ~90fps @ 1080p which would be a pretty smooth experience, but I’d expect much more given how powerful that card is)

Honestly I’m not super far into the game. (A couple hours at most?) But it hasn’t really grabbed my attention like other games have - which probably means I’ll have to start the game a couple times before I legitimately play it through and then I could probably give a better score.

At the moment I wouldn’t recommend paying $70+ for the game - but to use game pass if possible.

Not that anyone cares, but if I feel different about it after playing some more I’ll update my comment haha

98 here - I watched all of these and then some but I also watched all the 00s shows and cartoons. That being said I don’t consider myself a 90s kid.

Croco-duck

Well, it doesn’t help that privacyguides.org lists both Brave browser and search as recommendations.

I’d solely use Firefox if jetbrains had better JS debugging support for it.

So for now I use edge for that at work.

Also I really like the tab sleep and vertical tabs features on Edge.

But everything is Firefox on my personal machines

I like to think of it as a bunch of Discord servers (in a way). Each server is run by the owner / their moderation and can have different channels and rules in said server.

The idea of a “super community” doesnt seem like a bad one, but I’d rather have it be an aggregation of said communities then making it all one thing.

… Like maybe super list of c/aww communities that you can subscribe to at once.