AGI solved with this one simple trick, computer scientists hate him

Self improving is included in “general tasks.”

I don’t really see why it’s important whether or not it needs to be prompted because it’s really easy to write “improve yourself according to human standards” into a chatbox

The difference is if it self-improves at general tasks.

Next up: lojban

I will say why did they even bother using Claude for this.

What? That PR does very little?

If freebsd was copyleft PlayStation would’ve never used it in the first place. Same as the BSD TCP/IP stack with windows.

No you’re just overestimating executives, Ai’s were good enough for this job in the 90’s

It’s not, but a source can be validated by a human much easier than finding the source in the first place.

Use it like a fancy search engine.

Ask it for a source and verify it, you can even give the source to a doctor if you can’t

If you’re an american the AI is worth using, as you can ask it for a credible source and verifying that is much faster.

It’s not credible, but you can ask it for a credible source and read that, which is still incredibly helpful.

You should try heliboard, Foss replacement with more features, theming, and privacy!

I really think this is a bad idea these should really just be flagged, there’s many situations where asking these questions in necessary and there’s few if any other ways to get an answer

If you add support for archive tune’s remote play you could be a great companion app and make my need for spotifies remote play gone!

I haven’t even started chording on it tbh and it’s the best keyboard I’ve ever used by far. If you give it a month you’ll probably never want to use anything else ever again

I did think it was sooner but I honestly don’t think that’s that long ago for such a big breakthrough, I dunno.

I mean that still leaves them way more reasonable than the US.

In terms of research that is very little time.

Bad but he’s still the best the US has